Re: [CGA-EXT] [Fwd: Next steps on CSI after IETF71]

Hi Marcelo,
   Fair enough.

Cheers
Suresh

marcelo bagnulo wrote:
> Hi Suresh,
> 
> The next steps on the proxy send solution is to finnish the pb statement 
> and we can also in parallel evaluate different solutions. However at 
> this point, there are several solutions (at least two were presented in 
> the meeting) so it is not clear to us what is what the WG wants to do 
> with this.
> So, the position at this point is to keep the discussion and see how it 
> evolves, makes sense?
> 
> regards, marcelo
> 
> 
> Suresh Krishnan escribió:
>> Hi Marcelo and Gabriel,
>>   What about draft-krishnan-cgaext-proxy-send?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Suresh
>>
>> marcelo bagnulo wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> these are the next steps for the items discussed in the meeting.
>>> let us know if you have comments.
>>>
>>> Regards, Gabriel and marcelo
>>>
>>> Proxy SND Problem Statement
>>> draft-daley-send-spnd-prob-02
>>>
>>> One more version of the draft addressing comments in the meeting and 
>>> then we will ask for adoption
>>> The new version should address Dave Thaler comments about the 
>>> different scenarios, anycast case to be studied in more depth, 
>>> multicast is out of scope, may be kept just to mention what is not 
>>> covered by the solutions space
>>>
>>> Certificate profiles and Management
>>> Initial work being done, if more people is interested, join the team
>>>
>>> DHCPv6 Delegation of Certificates Option
>>> draft-popoviciu-dhc-certificate-opt-01.txt
>>> C. Popoviciu, R. Droms, E. Levy-Abegnoli - 15 min
>>>
>>> WG to read the draft and comment
>>>
>>> Hash Threat Analysis for SeND and Send Crypto Agility
>>> A. Kukec, S. Jiang, S. Krishnan - 20 min
>>> Authors to produce a draft including a proposal n how to encode hash 
>>> agility. If the proposal is adopted, this will be part of RFC3971 update
>>>
>>>
>>> 8. Update for RFC3971: support in SEND for non-CGA addresses
>>> E. Levy-Abegnoli
>>>
>>> Not clear how to deal with this, more disucssion is needed.
>>> What is clear is that something is needed in this space, since the 
>>> the original rfc3971 is incomplete in this area
>>>
>>> 9. Public key algortihm agility in SeND
>>> S. Shuo
>>> We expect two things: a draft on how to support ECC in SeND and CGAs, 
>>> and a proposal on how to support PK agility in SeND and CGAs to be 
>>> uncluded in the rfc3971/2 update
>>> People interested in working on this should contact the chairs
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CGA-EXT mailing list
>>> CGA-EXT@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext
>>
>>
> 

_______________________________________________
CGA-EXT mailing list
CGA-EXT@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext