IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [clue] Participant info/type followup

Christian Groves <Christian.Groves@nteczone.com> Mon, 07 April 2014 02:21 UTC

Return-Path: <Christian.Groves@nteczone.com>
X-Original-To: clue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: clue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12C071A064F for <clue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Apr 2014 19:21:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V84cOOP6hxj9 for <clue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Apr 2014 19:21:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cserver5.myshophosting.com (cserver5.myshophosting.com [175.107.161.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 903511A0329 for <clue@ietf.org>; Sun, 6 Apr 2014 19:21:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppp118-209-187-61.lns20.mel6.internode.on.net ([118.209.187.61]:63453 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by cserver5.myshophosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <Christian.Groves@nteczone.com>) id 1WWzBM-0008IA-4Q for clue@ietf.org; Mon, 07 Apr 2014 12:21:08 +1000
Message-ID: <53420B96.3010603@nteczone.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 12:21:10 +1000
From: Christian Groves <Christian.Groves@nteczone.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: clue@ietf.org
References: <5318809E.2030204@nteczone.com> <5318AE5E.4050404@alum.mit.edu> <5318B0C9.1050603@nteczone.com> <5318B48E.3090300@alum.mit.edu> <53290C9B.6090106@nteczone.com> <5329F3FF.7090606@alum.mit.edu> <533A16BA.40707@nteczone.com> <533A91BF.7040404@unina.it> <533B47FF.5020407@nteczone.com> <533D7E8F.4000303@alum.mit.edu> <49E45C59CA48264997FEBFB29B6BC2D6215264287E@CRPMBOXPRD07.polycom.com>
In-Reply-To: <49E45C59CA48264997FEBFB29B6BC2D6215264287E@CRPMBOXPRD07.polycom.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cserver5.myshophosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - nteczone.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: cserver5.myshophosting.com: authenticated_id: christian.groves@nteczone.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/clue/viJfwtukAJWg4Rlmg2naSRzmTXM
Subject: Re: [clue] Participant info/type followup
X-BeenThere: clue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: CLUE - ControLling mUltiple streams for TElepresence <clue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/clue>, <mailto:clue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/clue/>
List-Post: <mailto:clue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:clue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/clue>, <mailto:clue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 02:21:23 -0000

Hello Mark,

Please see below.

Regards, Christian

On 5/04/2014 2:46 AM, Duckworth, Mark wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: clue [mailto:clue-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Paul Kyzivat
>> Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2014 11:30 AM
>> To: clue@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [clue] Participant info/type followup
>>
>> ISTM we have both a semantic issue and a syntactic/terminological issue:
>>
>> - we have the semantic distinction between who is represented within
>>     the capture and who is responsible for sending the capture
> [Duckworth, Mark] I agree, but I thought the intent of the participant attributes was to give information about "who is represented within the capture" and not about "who is responsible for sending the capture".  From the framework:
>
>      "... information regarding the conference participants *in* a Capture."
>      "... indicates the type of participant/s contained *in* the capture..."
>
> [Duckworth, Mark] I think we don't need to add a way to indicate "who is responsible for sending the capture".  IIRC, this was not a goal of the original proposal and discussion about "roles".  But if the group agrees we should add this now, I wouldn't object too strongly.
[CNG] I agree when I proposed it I was thinking about "who was in the 
capture" rather than who was sending the capture. The issue only came to 
life when Jonathon asked what it meant for a presentation capture. I'd 
be OK to drop "who sends the capture" but we would still need to clarify 
the presentation capture case.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email