IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [codec] WGLC #2 for draft-ietf-codec-opus-10

Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin@jmvalin.ca> Tue, 15 November 2011 22:52 UTC

Return-Path: <jmvalin@jmvalin.ca>
X-Original-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B89B1F0C97 for <codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 14:52:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.433
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.433 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FF_IHOPE_YOU_SINK=2.166, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id khi3kcHtzUG2 for <codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 14:52:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dm-mail03.mozilla.org (dm-mail03.mozilla.org [63.245.208.213]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAA891F0C96 for <codec@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 14:52:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.112] (60-248-154-172.HINET-IP.hinet.net [60.248.154.172]) (Authenticated sender: jvalin@mozilla.com) by dm-mail03.mozilla.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8846C4AEDF0; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 14:52:03 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4EC2ED47.5030005@jmvalin.ca>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 06:52:55 +0800
From: Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin@jmvalin.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Christian Hoene <hoene@uni-tuebingen.de>
References: <4EAF4419.3000502@jdrosen.net> <027A93CE4A670242BD91A44E37105AEF3BB9CEAE91@ESESSCMS0351.eemea.ericsson.se> <4EBADE3B.4000904@mozilla.com> <027A93CE4A670242BD91A44E37105AEF3BB9FEE83D@ESESSCMS0351.eemea.ericsson.se> <005d01cca3d9$b551a800$1ff4f800$@uni-tuebingen.de>
In-Reply-To: <005d01cca3d9$b551a800$1ff4f800$@uni-tuebingen.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: codec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [codec] WGLC #2 for draft-ietf-codec-opus-10
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:52:06 -0000

On 16/11/11 05:01 AM, Christian Hoene wrote:
>> One problem with the proposed way of conformance testing with normative
>> decoder becomes already apparent with the separate test vectors for the
>> FIXED and FLOAT implementations. At least for the mono test vectors 3 and
>> 4, the FIXED implementation fails when comparing to the FLOAT test vector
>> and vice versa.
> 
> [Christian Hoene] Is this a bug that needs to be fixed?

No (I checked). It's merely due to the comparison tool being quite
strict, which is also why we decided to provide both float and fixed
testing tools. I've prepared a slide to discuss this topic in more
details during the meeting, so don't worry.

Cheers,

	Jean-Marc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email