IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [codec] WGLC #2 for draft-ietf-codec-opus-10

"Christian Hoene" <hoene@uni-tuebingen.de> Tue, 15 November 2011 21:01 UTC

Return-Path: <hoene@uni-tuebingen.de>
X-Original-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: codec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3772611E80C8 for <codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:01:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xQP5Kj0hcMz7 for <codec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:01:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx06.uni-tuebingen.de (mx06.uni-tuebingen.de [134.2.3.3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6339A11E80BA for <codec@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:01:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hoeneT60 (p5482B0A1.dip.t-dialin.net [84.130.176.161]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx06.uni-tuebingen.de (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id pAFL0tg8008537 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:01:02 +0100
From: Christian Hoene <hoene@uni-tuebingen.de>
To: 'Erik Norvell' <erik.norvell@ericsson.com>, 'Jean-Marc Valin' <jmvalin@mozilla.com>
References: <4EAF4419.3000502@jdrosen.net> <027A93CE4A670242BD91A44E37105AEF3BB9CEAE91@ESESSCMS0351.eemea.ericsson.se> <4EBADE3B.4000904@mozilla.com> <027A93CE4A670242BD91A44E37105AEF3BB9FEE83D@ESESSCMS0351.eemea.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <027A93CE4A670242BD91A44E37105AEF3BB9FEE83D@ESESSCMS0351.eemea.ericsson.se>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:01:05 +0100
Organization: Universitat Tubingen
Message-ID: <005d01cca3d9$b551a800$1ff4f800$@uni-tuebingen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQGdnFS6OFAQH0NkTgh2ZlsqwZro7AGUNOupAXky+fEBu000pJXmMw0w
Content-Language: de
X-AntiVirus: NOT checked by Avira MailGate (version: 3.2.1.23; host: mx06)
Cc: codec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [codec] WGLC #2 for draft-ietf-codec-opus-10
X-BeenThere: codec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Codec WG <codec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/codec>
List-Post: <mailto:codec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codec>, <mailto:codec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 21:01:06 -0000

> One problem with the proposed way of conformance testing with normative
> decoder becomes already apparent with the separate test vectors for the
> FIXED and FLOAT implementations. At least for the mono test vectors 3 and
> 4, the FIXED implementation fails when comparing to the FLOAT test vector
> and vice versa.

[Christian Hoene] Is this a bug that needs to be fixed?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email