Re: [core] [CoRE] Working Group Last Call (WGLC) of draft-ietf-core-target-attr-01

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Mon, 20 February 2023 21:34 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5B5AC14CF1E for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 13:34:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5JELL4E_qILL for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 13:34:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D674EC14CEFD for <core@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 13:34:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.217.124] (p548dc9a4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.201.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4PLG0F1BvJzDCcQ; Mon, 20 Feb 2023 22:34:37 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <DU0P190MB1978B678DD3765EFD842E320FDA49@DU0P190MB1978.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2023 22:34:36 +0100
Cc: "core@ietf.org" <core@ietf.org>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 698621676.47276-c958c3c1344cfbe6a20d5da31346f3cc
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <BAB25328-8CC1-49B9-A1CF-D6B3BBE289B0@tzi.org>
References: <a1d15c56-c447-ac5a-6c6c-40a1780f748c@ri.se> <DB9PR08MB65241EE57923384B5B5B646C9CA29@DB9PR08MB6524.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> <DU0P190MB1978C4F3E4D2F3EECA6BBEEBFDA49@DU0P190MB1978.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <E850AD05-0672-41E0-90F3-69E81A66001B@tzi.org> <DU0P190MB19787F1D25315653BBBF3463FDA49@DU0P190MB1978.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <F3701EC3-6D46-41C3-A4CD-B0D413DE8B00@tzi.org> <DU0P190MB1978B678DD3765EFD842E320FDA49@DU0P190MB1978.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
To: Esko Dijk <esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/CIapEEEoObUycYEanke2gKghJ7I>
Subject: Re: [core] [CoRE] Working Group Last Call (WGLC) of draft-ietf-core-target-attr-01
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2023 21:34:43 -0000

On 2023-02-20, at 16:40, Esko Dijk <esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl> wrote:
> 
>> Do you think something like this should be part of the document?
> 
> We can just mention it in the document as good practice for the expert (in case of doubt, potential security issues, etc). By mentioning the mailing list explicitly we then have a "forum" to bring forward any such issues, at least.

I added two sentences (and some structure) in
https://github.com/core-wg/core-target-attr/pull/10

Grüße, Carsten

> 
> Esko
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> 
> Sent: Monday, February 20, 2023 14:06
> To: Esko Dijk <esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl>
> Cc: Thomas Fossati <Thomas.Fossati@arm.com>; Marco Tiloca <marco.tiloca=40ri.se@dmarc.ietf.org>; core@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [core] [CoRE] Working Group Last Call (WGLC) of draft-ietf-core-target-attr-01
> 
> On 2023-02-20, at 13:51, Esko Dijk <esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl> wrote:
>> 
>> Thanks, I do think the expert could send an email to the core-parameters list in case of any doubt/issues/questions. This could be security-related, or it could be a concern of required orchestration: if different names with similar / same intent being registered.
>> If no response on core-parameters within some time (7 days?) then the expert can opt to just continue.
> 
> Do you think something like this should be part of the document?
> Or just good practice?
> 
>> In the end, the expert makes the decision and not the email list collectively. And for most cases the mailing list wouldn't be needed.
> 
> Right.
> 
> Grüße, Carsten
>