Re: [dane] PGP security models, was Summary of IETF LC for draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey

Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Wed, 23 September 2015 15:29 UTC

Return-Path: <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 318021A7005; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 08:29:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.235
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OOyov-pnvRKI; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 08:29:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com (mail.painless-security.com [23.30.188.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A9681A6FFD; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 08:29:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B2DB20809; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 11:28:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail.painless-security.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.suchdamage.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bg3m32yWeNgL; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 11:28:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (c-50-136-30-120.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [50.136.30.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) by mail.painless-security.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 11:28:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 4FD0E80CE0; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 11:29:05 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
References: <20150921172109.19893.qmail@ary.lan> <alpine.LFD.2.20.1509211455150.420@bofh.nohats.ca> <m2pp19ztmu.wl%randy@psg.com> <20150923035731.GZ21942@mournblade.imrryr.org> <m21tdpy2oa.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 11:29:05 -0400
In-Reply-To: <m21tdpy2oa.wl%randy@psg.com> (Randy Bush's message of "Wed, 23 Sep 2015 14:12:37 +0600")
Message-ID: <tslk2rhgnni.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/-FqXegBHs5qfI0sLq6Jav9HkmQU>
Cc: dane@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dane] PGP security models, was Summary of IETF LC for draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 15:29:09 -0000

My take here is that there are a lot of different thoughts about trust
models, and as such, I tend to agree with John and others who have
suggested the document should be more clear about its assumptions.