Re: [dane] PGP security models, was Summary of IETF LC for draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Wed, 23 September 2015 16:50 UTC

To: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
References: <20150921172109.19893.qmail@ary.lan> <alpine.LFD.2.20.1509211455150.420@bofh.nohats.ca> <m2pp19ztmu.wl%randy@psg.com> <20150923035731.GZ21942@mournblade.imrryr.org> <m21tdpy2oa.wl%randy@psg.com> <tslk2rhgnni.fsf@mit.edu> <5602C6CD.2050200@dcrocker.net> <tsl37y5glvo.fsf@mit.edu>
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <5602D835.9070305@dcrocker.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 09:49:57 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <tsl37y5glvo.fsf@mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/jpAFnnrlvbrCNHauwbiPC4_mk-o>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, dane@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dane] PGP security models, was Summary of IETF LC for draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net

On 9/23/2015 9:07 AM, Sam Hartman wrote:
>>>>>> "Dave" == Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> writes:
>     Dave> On 9/23/2015 8:29 AM, Sam Hartman wrote:
>     >> I tend to agree with John and others who have suggested the
>     >> document should be more clear about its assumptions.
> 
>     Dave> Assumptions, models, details, etc., with operational and risk
>     Dave> implications.
> 
> Hi, Dave.
> It would be easy to read the above as trying to restate  my position to
>  be broader than I intended.
> 
> I'm specifically supporting the idea that the document should clearly
> state its trust model.
> I understand other comments have been made; I'm not expressing an
> opinion on those.


My note intended to build from yours, not clarify it.

So my note stated my views, and wasn't trying to state yours.

d/


-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net

Re: [dane] Summary of IETF LC for draft-ietf-dane… Viktor Dukhovni
Re: [dane] PGP security models, was Summary of IE… John Levine
Re: [dane] PGP security models, was Summary of IE… Paul Wouters
Re: [dane] PGP security models, was Summary of IE… manning
Re: [dane] PGP security models, was Summary of IE… manning
Re: [dane] PGP security models, was Summary of IE… Scott Kitterman
Re: [dane] PGP security models, was Summary of IE… John C Klensin
Re: [dane] PGP security models, was Summary of IE… Joe Abley
Re: [dane] PGP security models, was Summary of IE… Paul Wouters
Re: [dane] provisioning assumptions, was PGP secu… John Levine
Re: [dane] provisioning assumptions, was PGP secu… Paul Wouters
Re: [dane] PGP security models, was Summary of IE… Randy Bush
Re: [dane] PGP security models, was Summary of IE… Viktor Dukhovni
Re: [dane] PGP security models, was Summary of IE… Randy Bush
Re: [dane] PGP security models, was Summary of IE… Sam Hartman
Re: [dane] PGP security models, was Summary of IE… Dave Crocker
Re: [dane] PGP security models, was Summary of IE… Paul Wouters
Re: [dane] PGP security models, was Summary of IE… Sam Hartman
Re: [dane] PGP security models, was Summary of IE… Dave Crocker