Re: [dane] PGP security models, was Summary of IETF LC for draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Mon, 21 September 2015 17:21 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB7481ACD44 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 10:21:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.663
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.663 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5CU-b1UuqcHh for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 10:21:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99A4B1ACD25 for <dane@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Sep 2015 10:21:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 25005 invoked from network); 21 Sep 2015 17:21:31 -0000
Received: from unknown (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 21 Sep 2015 17:21:31 -0000
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 17:21:09 -0000
Message-ID: <20150921172109.19893.qmail@ary.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <931830E6-6B8C-410E-9B57-F3E5CB5AE5B8@dukhovni.org>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/R2i3JfGrosyt4fK_JSukDUsdZDU>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, dane@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dane] PGP security models, was Summary of IETF LC for draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 17:21:34 -0000

>OPENPGP is a data format, WoT is one way to employ that format to
>exchange messages.   It is not a *required* way to use OPENPGP.

Sure, but it's the way that everyone has used PGP for 20 years,
and it's the security model that everyone I know expects when they
use PGP keys.

This draft uses a model in which the key is bound to a mailbox, not
any stronger identity, and you have to trust that the domain's
management fairly represents its users rather than e.g., publishing
MITM keys that it controls.  That's not a ridiculous model, but if
that's the model, the draft and draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-usage need
to say so.  At this point, neither does.

R's,
John