Re: [dhcwg] DHCPv6 Failover -- LAST CHANCE

Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com> Tue, 06 September 2016 11:34 UTC

Return-Path: <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAD8112B533 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Sep 2016 04:34:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ySMbvFRMYf-7 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Sep 2016 04:34:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x22d.google.com (mail-lf0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2372A12B4EF for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Sep 2016 04:26:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id u14so21080424lfd.1 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 06 Sep 2016 04:26:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=io8bh4SdelmywbdTqRrUr8wVp1jYPQvZOXaExEFQ34A=; b=E5XMBNFaWyAkFDIFn1vXpmRhJfQgjpsVeiqTI32hhaUXw3jmjgcaw99x6YB8nyGqer mFG07fzPbk7GCHKSyr3DhWk/vfKYVGIUB18YXbXz9FhkMa11TIB8wSOlWexdeUt0hMFx IWLr08mCqW3it1Og7esKemGxyuqaUCJpSOzXkKqp2uQSo+SDWLtR6+RTBP3bftVjYvV1 cNCYiPYQGd0jFMKIE7xm0nSnqd5snG8ymy7hQuGgWPFiGdLU6DNdmHfnya9DZp5BLG7g mt3tevOWO4DwnKhd+iUXB9VYMo1wdUveHX+RhNvrJGUcAQnYgA0lnHDURKCHjRn9bJD+ YF2w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=io8bh4SdelmywbdTqRrUr8wVp1jYPQvZOXaExEFQ34A=; b=M3FZHtJpRPfR1BqwPw4IqT/QEF9uh89ZhDk/bjMLX2L6+JO3/C891GWnnEY7f1WBTA B7mCxgjX/8U/OEFXatA9ixVxnond/98mwHH1p6+BpYCz/tbEQIXc9Gu6h7KexxDNfhII B0XHL+V11sUTuu74J00X3y6bJXZyGWEm/9xzXKUzTIQvqmi7OEEt9RPMQRrCgWvKgS39 eOYFIpKJYNuB0ozTh+wNTw/o7BKGlfLiAm3k4YHmqCd+az/lY2ycAw64E3qXqglKniN2 hRDoz/hd9BTtky3bRDepm5n+f6CxPZaopE8VO3KJlPRD0BpncZYJ9bwDFjpyRPvhM1Wg CydA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwMTkB+zGfqraIpcKSFHZsXkQdBB+Qnj+kaq2Eviiud7G5z4XxweNXdV38TsOPpNVg==
X-Received: by 10.25.34.65 with SMTP id i62mr12477816lfi.7.1473161200798; Tue, 06 Sep 2016 04:26:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from voyager2.local (093105179034.dynamic-ww-02.vectranet.pl. [93.105.179.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id g201sm5605494lfg.8.2016.09.06.04.26.39 for <dhcwg@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 06 Sep 2016 04:26:39 -0700 (PDT)
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
References: <58B66897-2F0D-4916-AF5A-42D5DC172DE5@cisco.com>
From: Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <fe0c5b6a-50cc-b495-9689-8260dd96191b@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2016 13:28:53 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <58B66897-2F0D-4916-AF5A-42D5DC172DE5@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/2lkHjGQOG6wadtoGFPxkY3pmVNk>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] DHCPv6 Failover -- LAST CHANCE
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2016 11:34:51 -0000

On 02/09/16 21:23, Kim Kinnear wrote:
> We have some detailed technical reviews.  What we *really* need now
> are people to just read it and say:
> 
>   "I think this draft should move forward".
Being one of the people who reviewed it, let me reiterate my support for
this document moving forward. It defines useful functionality and there
are people running actual networks who asked for failover.

Tomek