IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] DHCPv6 Failover -- LAST CHANCE

Kim Kinnear <kkinnear@cisco.com> Wed, 14 September 2016 13:51 UTC

Return-Path: <kkinnear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7A6812B716 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 06:51:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -16.009
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.508, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uO6GOSgJUlSX for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 06:51:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 409AA12B7E7 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 06:12:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1162; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1473858725; x=1475068325; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=zz/uRxphprGczMEU/TFbu+v17ZZyWw9uf899Qv6UH4M=; b=YMz9zZuAdtXAlGeBDMh0vXWBa7QVt+T3R47Vfn3V4rnLXdiXhHSaLXs9 hd1aepxSpM2Y+fp633qsdL4e/kBx7KYS6noAOEHqKD8KTTpj2ohH22zbl iu8Se+tvLKcYP0Vf1nbvGnQyFJi0B4khw8fLaKFGVtqcTvlzjWjaQxBLS Q=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.30,333,1470700800"; d="scan'208";a="147099077"
Received: from alln-core-2.cisco.com ([173.36.13.135]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 14 Sep 2016 13:12:04 +0000
Received: from [10.131.32.49] ([10.131.32.49]) (authenticated bits=0) by alln-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u8EDC0HA031682 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 14 Sep 2016 13:12:02 GMT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\))
From: Kim Kinnear <kkinnear@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <9d8bf292-53ef-f0f8-34c4-7ae34c945210@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 09:12:03 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F06DA2F2-7C6A-476F-A5C5-7131D330DE17@cisco.com>
References: <58B66897-2F0D-4916-AF5A-42D5DC172DE5@cisco.com> <CAFx+hEPS+c1-d9TyOccLdhjDtBUots4LuXdDi6iV6ECaReb9eQ@mail.gmail.com> <313807947.869636.1473340159086.JavaMail.zimbra@network1.net> <CAFx+hENvg_CeBh0Sxn+-ynTY0oT-wJ3pD9X_CoW2VYpBwQa_LA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+dB4X51=6VMyovihDqCGAvgQ9LK6R1w7LT_c6NooyKE6WoyYQ@mail.gmail.com> <9d8bf292-53ef-f0f8-34c4-7ae34c945210@gmail.com>
To: Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112)
X-Authenticated-User: kkinnear
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/HFTaEz2dMj8t4bPpT77e8iSSw_o>
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org, Kim Kinnear <kkinnear@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] DHCPv6 Failover -- LAST CHANCE
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 13:51:27 -0000

I agree with Tomek, we'd love more technical reviews.  Another
week is a small price to pay for that.  Who knows, maybe some
other folks will take the time to review it too :-)

But, as Tomek said, it is up to Bernie.

Cheers -- Kim

> On Sep 14, 2016, at 8:46 AM, Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On 14/09/16 07:34, yogendra pal wrote:
>> Given this draft is in very much detailed and focused w/ HA design. I
>> would request if we can extend the WGLC for another date (21st). I have
>> started reading it and will be finishing mid of next week.
> Hi,
> Thank you for spending your time on this. As I'm co-author, it is up to
> Bernie to make the actual decision, but I would be very much in favor of
> extending the deadline. This draft has been around for years, so a week
> one way or the other doesn't change anything. And additional technical
> reviews are something we definitely could wait for.
> 
> Thank you for reviewing this draft,
> Tomek
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email