IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] DHCPv6 Failover -- LAST CHANCE

Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com> Wed, 14 September 2016 12:51 UTC

Return-Path: <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28BC612B75A for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 05:51:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SjlWaisabBmi for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 05:51:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x22c.google.com (mail-lf0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 059AA12B716 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 05:44:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id h127so9080134lfh.0 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 05:44:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tKSWO8/0D4N5BnExR4TN3q87ZJFKDoj3uqcMi5fSgbM=; b=GCw3l3xa2vnDG6v9/mO8c9QSoX+SZxZAfVl51pK5INKKZklk/3GZREyVYXJZ7OanxX K41ZZ2MKGl81/vPOjetUpA4Er6SXTLZw79dM2FBCCFx9Emwg8DkhmcICFTzrcPiyZgOj EdTy7Sog2pJ10ACVPF31qXukv36Ww0wut/KzWKd0I18Hlw6uqf8JoV5EmoLjIvSGRAGM NcpO9Qr9gE+simGc6ua+6IP0MddN9Du+JrDtwkRO4522LTjYF46w7VWbwpELRyK7suw3 wIHTVynRlnRSx/WI5B5czoHhShBp1vbEUy+Q2eC2a34VKJy4uJ2ItlAb0vZVhDwLrwYZ PreQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tKSWO8/0D4N5BnExR4TN3q87ZJFKDoj3uqcMi5fSgbM=; b=Cbnm5iuylA+X1Zfm5fz8YzvAFytd0xoETI1Z2i6i07tvo/j7yhMwaYysu+kq0azfJn GzkvCcdk/z8k0vvZvU7cRqlDK8VeyxxAsn+q38uzI9qC0Ppxgb3UDFcGUfNYiJ0CeqY3 QlYKIo9eq/DlSuKCbYKfqSZLh/9bAazu+gMSaoBpMU8MpY40N29/mL8wTPnZO+0Jm6JM nqndsd4gw5NlBIueD9GZpKVYvlbAVZCdgVr0ybW5cuT8IDgz3ek+8qBukm391O7upCHN ktx7RUNdDCZftbLdtHhYvxxYyp1NMF/GlPgzszzKSD3BVasR9K+Q8hGYV3lS6lUVFsxJ FBGA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwP3U6NIjRKO8dve63Ogt8jB1uuIJLgw0RaxYd5apsTfzRtaRxvKxDoNRCNRTtEF6A==
X-Received: by 10.25.15.219 with SMTP id 88mr998108lfp.47.1473857047491; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 05:44:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from voyager2.local (093105179034.dynamic-ww-02.vectranet.pl. [93.105.179.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id h78sm4908989ljh.45.2016.09.14.05.44.05 for <dhcwg@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 14 Sep 2016 05:44:06 -0700 (PDT)
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
References: <58B66897-2F0D-4916-AF5A-42D5DC172DE5@cisco.com> <CAFx+hEPS+c1-d9TyOccLdhjDtBUots4LuXdDi6iV6ECaReb9eQ@mail.gmail.com> <313807947.869636.1473340159086.JavaMail.zimbra@network1.net> <CAFx+hENvg_CeBh0Sxn+-ynTY0oT-wJ3pD9X_CoW2VYpBwQa_LA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+dB4X51=6VMyovihDqCGAvgQ9LK6R1w7LT_c6NooyKE6WoyYQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <9d8bf292-53ef-f0f8-34c4-7ae34c945210@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 14:46:34 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CA+dB4X51=6VMyovihDqCGAvgQ9LK6R1w7LT_c6NooyKE6WoyYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/jsnTmPFGPP8paVR_CY41YUD2xzI>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] DHCPv6 Failover -- LAST CHANCE
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 12:51:14 -0000

On 14/09/16 07:34, yogendra pal wrote:
> Given this draft is in very much detailed and focused w/ HA design. I
> would request if we can extend the WGLC for another date (21st). I have
> started reading it and will be finishing mid of next week.
Hi,
Thank you for spending your time on this. As I'm co-author, it is up to
Bernie to make the actual decision, but I would be very much in favor of
extending the deadline. This draft has been around for years, so a week
one way or the other doesn't change anything. And additional technical
reviews are something we definitely could wait for.

Thank you for reviewing this draft,
Tomek

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email