IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] Call for Adoption, draft-troan-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-00 as WG item

Tina TSOU <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com> Fri, 06 April 2012 15:56 UTC

Return-Path: <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F41C21F84CE for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Apr 2012 08:56:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oH8qxVezVwfS for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Apr 2012 08:56:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dfwrgout.huawei.com (dfwrgout.huawei.com [206.16.17.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6435E21F84B9 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Apr 2012 08:56:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.9.243 (EHLO dfweml202-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.9.243]) by dfwrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.2.3-GA FastPath) with ESMTP id AFA04868; Fri, 06 Apr 2012 11:56:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from DFWEML407-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.132) by dfweml202-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.9.108) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Fri, 6 Apr 2012 08:56:20 -0700
Received: from SZXEML401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.31) by dfweml407-hub.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.132) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Fri, 6 Apr 2012 08:56:18 -0700
Received: from SZXEML526-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.214]) by szxeml401-hub.china.huawei.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Fri, 6 Apr 2012 23:56:11 +0800
From: Tina TSOU <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com>
To: Timothy Winters <twinters@iol.unh.edu>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] Call for Adoption, draft-troan-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-00 as WG item
Thread-Index: AQHNE/HAR9dj6umuXE+JtWrROoPHsJaN867c
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 15:56:10 +0000
Message-ID: <DF707EA3-4367-4605-9313-CF8EF10ACD12@huawei.com>
References: <D9B5773329187548A0189ED6503667890B9F42CB@XMB-RCD-101.cisco.com> <DDF37113-DA02-47E4-BD64-828C9C5C384B@nominum.com> <3F4910A77924AF44876B1A096ECC92A7D4AB2DA375@MOPESMBX01.eu.thmulti.com>, <38C3CFA7-5919-4BC8-B092-A772C6B67F63@iol.unh.edu>
In-Reply-To: <38C3CFA7-5919-4BC8-B092-A772C6B67F63@iol.unh.edu>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DF707EA3436746059313CF8EF10ACD12huaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org WG" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Call for Adoption, draft-troan-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-00 as WG item
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 15:56:24 -0000

I support adopting this as WG item.

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 6, 2012, at 5:35 AM, "Timothy Winters" <twinters@iol.unh.edu<mailto:twinters@iol.unh.edu>> wrote:

I also support this becoming a DHC WG item.

Regards,
Tim

On Apr 6, 2012, at 2:12 AM, Dedecker Hans wrote:

I support adopting this as a DHC WG item.

BR,
Hans

From: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org> [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf OfTed Lemon
Sent: donderdag 5 april 2012 19:35
To: dhcwg@ietf.org<mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org> WG
Subject: [dhcwg] Call for Adoption, draft-troan-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-00 as WG item

On Apr 5, 2012, at 1:25 PM, Bernie Volz (volz) <volz@cisco.com<mailto:volz@cisco.com>> wrote:
At the Paris IETF-83 DHC WG meeting there was a lot of support for (and I believe no opposition) adopting this as a DHC WG item.

I kindly request that we adopt this document as a DHC WG work item.

This draft documents issues that have come up involving interactions between prefix delegation and regular IP address allocation in practice.   If you would like the working group to work on documenting this, please signify by responding to this message in the affirmative.   If you don't think we should work on it, please respond in the negative.   If you have no opinion, please do not respond.

We will determine consensus on Thursday, April 19.

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org<mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email