Re: [dhcwg] Fwd: Call for Adoption, draft-troan-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-00 as WG item

"Weil, Jason" <jason.weil@twcable.com> Mon, 16 April 2012 18:13 UTC

Return-Path: <jason.weil@twcable.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3702E11E80AB for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:13:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.027
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.027 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-1.11, HELO_EQ_MODEMCABLE=0.768, HOST_EQ_MODEMCABLE=1.368, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 174smpuMmbLb for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:13:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cdpipgw01.twcable.com (cdpipgw01.twcable.com [165.237.59.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4168011E80DB for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:13:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-SENDER-IP: 10.136.163.11
X-SENDER-REPUTATION: None
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.75,429,1330923600"; d="scan'208,217"; a="368330197"
Received: from unknown (HELO PRVPEXHUB02.corp.twcable.com) ([10.136.163.11]) by cdpipgw01.twcable.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-MD5; 16 Apr 2012 14:05:46 -0400
Received: from PRVPEXVS12.corp.twcable.com ([10.136.163.44]) by PRVPEXHUB02.corp.twcable.com ([10.136.163.11]) with mapi; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 14:06:27 -0400
From: "Weil, Jason" <jason.weil@twcable.com>
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>, DHC WG <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 14:06:25 -0400
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] Fwd: Call for Adoption, draft-troan-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-00 as WG item
Thread-Index: Ac0b+6RVrry1k6sVRUGNfb94RRbqhA==
Message-ID: <CBB1D760.1542B%jason.weil@twcable.com>
In-Reply-To: <0DB4E514-A0A0-4F15-ACD2-BD5C6F7477BE@nominum.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.10.0.110310
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CBB1D7601542Bjasonweiltwcablecom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Fwd: Call for Adoption, draft-troan-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-00 as WG item
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 18:13:33 -0000

I am definitely interested in seeing this move forward especially for all those working on client implementations out there in the world.

Thanks,

Jason

From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com<mailto:Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:24:16 -0400
To: DHC WG <dhcwg@ietf.org<mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>>
Subject: [dhcwg] Fwd: Call for Adoption, draft-troan-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-00 as WG item

Reminder, we're halfway through the last call period for this document.   We've gotten a good response, so there's no need to respond if you aren't that interested, but if you are interested and haven't responded, please do.


Begin forwarded message:

From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com<mailto:Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>>
Subject: [dhcwg] Call for Adoption, draft-troan-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-00 as WG item
Date: April 5, 2012 1:34:46 PM EDT
To: "dhcwg@ietf.org<mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org> WG" <dhcwg@ietf.org<mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>>

On Apr 5, 2012, at 1:25 PM, Bernie Volz (volz) <volz@cisco.com<mailto:volz@cisco.com>> wrote:
At the Paris IETF-83 DHC WG meeting there was a lot of support for (and I believe no opposition) adopting this as a DHC WG item.

I kindly request that we adopt this document as a DHC WG work item.

This draft documents issues that have come up involving interactions between prefix delegation and regular IP address allocation in practice.   If you would like the working group to work on documenting this, please signify by responding to this message in the affirmative.   If you don't think we should work on it, please respond in the negative.   If you have no opinion, please do not respond.

We will determine consensus on Thursday, April 19.

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org<mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg


________________________________
This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.