IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] Call for Adoption, draft-troan-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-00 as WG item

Kim Kinnear <kkinnear@cisco.com> Thu, 05 April 2012 18:25 UTC

Return-Path: <kkinnear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62FD321F869D for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 11:25:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8igaX9weoans for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 11:25:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49CF721F84B5 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 11:24:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=kkinnear@cisco.com; l=1037; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1333650293; x=1334859893; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=UemQe9+kieN+WWeFpcrYQOB/vwv2WSNF2aYhAoRKPGc=; b=nJVeCIC9UFYsOPrbjfFTj/MHknTG/Ufjcb2xMqCqJH1V98ptlFWIeIYY Sx9x4KyPa+J1zfiqYnJZBDWaJkRl8Xy/1CiEuV3/NlnybZwTXTwHQF4+R cklfhMJvEuLbeewNAfTKCCkqgERfKZ3of7Fi+4OD8FSTNPj8dJYxYGhLa 8=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,377,1330905600"; d="scan'208";a="72402315"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Apr 2012 18:24:53 +0000
Received: from [161.44.65.102] ([161.44.65.102]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q35IOqZa019826; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 18:24:52 GMT
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Kim Kinnear <kkinnear@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <DDF37113-DA02-47E4-BD64-828C9C5C384B@nominum.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 14:25:09 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6823A379-9521-4222-B855-BFAFE6D408E0@cisco.com>
References: <D9B5773329187548A0189ED6503667890B9F42CB@XMB-RCD-101.cisco.com> <DDF37113-DA02-47E4-BD64-828C9C5C384B@nominum.com>
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org WG" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, Kim Kinnear <kkinnear@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Call for Adoption, draft-troan-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-00 as WG item
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 18:25:02 -0000

I support adopting this as a DHC WG work item.

Regards -- Kim

On Apr 5, 2012, at 1:34 PM, Ted Lemon wrote:

> On Apr 5, 2012, at 1:25 PM, Bernie Volz (volz) <volz@cisco.com> wrote:
>> At the Paris IETF-83 DHC WG meeting there was a lot of support for (and I believe no opposition) adopting this as a DHC WG item.
>>  
>> I kindly request that we adopt this document as a DHC WG work item.
> 
> This draft documents issues that have come up involving interactions between prefix delegation and regular IP address allocation in practice.   If you would like the working group to work on documenting this, please signify by responding to this message in the affirmative.   If you don't think we should work on it, please respond in the negative.   If you have no opinion, please do not respond.
> 
> We will determine consensus on Thursday, April 19. 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email