IETF Logo Mail Archive

[dhcwg] Fwd: Call for Adoption, draft-troan-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-00 as WG item

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Mon, 16 April 2012 15:24 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D347521F8653 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 08:24:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.49
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.49 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.108, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 33EVO2XaP4In for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 08:24:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og124.obsmtp.com (exprod7og124.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.26]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C5D521F8650 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 08:24:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob124.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT4w5obp9HgSvnywG7gfjQ7OHM8K0Rqyx@postini.com; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 08:24:20 PDT
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF80B1B839A for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 08:24:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-01.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D64FB190064 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 08:24:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
Received: from MBX-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.133]) by CAS-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.131]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 08:24:16 -0700
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
To: DHC WG <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] Call for Adoption, draft-troan-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-00 as WG item
Thread-Index: AQHNE1Jkl7tgtOxKmkWYH3w2Igkw0Q==
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 15:24:16 +0000
Message-ID: <0DB4E514-A0A0-4F15-ACD2-BD5C6F7477BE@nominum.com>
References: <DDF37113-DA02-47E4-BD64-828C9C5C384B@nominum.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.168.1.10]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_0DB4E514A0A04F15ACD2BD5C6F7477BEnominumcom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [dhcwg] Fwd: Call for Adoption, draft-troan-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-00 as WG item
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 15:24:29 -0000

Reminder, we're halfway through the last call period for this document.   We've gotten a good response, so there's no need to respond if you aren't that interested, but if you are interested and haven't responded, please do.


Begin forwarded message:

From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com<mailto:Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>>
Subject: [dhcwg] Call for Adoption, draft-troan-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-00 as WG item
Date: April 5, 2012 1:34:46 PM EDT
To: "dhcwg@ietf.org<mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org> WG" <dhcwg@ietf.org<mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>>

On Apr 5, 2012, at 1:25 PM, Bernie Volz (volz) <volz@cisco.com<mailto:volz@cisco.com>> wrote:
At the Paris IETF-83 DHC WG meeting there was a lot of support for (and I believe no opposition) adopting this as a DHC WG item.

I kindly request that we adopt this document as a DHC WG work item.

This draft documents issues that have come up involving interactions between prefix delegation and regular IP address allocation in practice.   If you would like the working group to work on documenting this, please signify by responding to this message in the affirmative.   If you don't think we should work on it, please respond in the negative.   If you have no opinion, please do not respond.

We will determine consensus on Thursday, April 19.

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org<mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email