IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] Call for Adoption, draft-troan-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-00 as WG item

"Gaurav Halwasia (ghalwasi)" <ghalwasi@cisco.com> Sat, 07 April 2012 03:29 UTC

Return-Path: <ghalwasi@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F6E121F851D for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Apr 2012 20:29:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q5hCBfiItkYI for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Apr 2012 20:29:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bgl-iport-1.cisco.com (bgl-iport-1.cisco.com [72.163.197.25]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49B1A21F851B for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Apr 2012 20:29:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=ghalwasi@cisco.com; l=9243; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1333769347; x=1334978947; h=mime-version:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:from:to; bh=/ra5aQma41/lpI9eUu7LO1ar0wil7UQTsv1ID7IQEg4=; b=XIZWFV2T63CywR/imQEnsru7DSRj4rWur3qc3V6mSFfPJPl/8wcJJas0 qKuixSZYepIhfi4RBKdBwY0QZ+Z7zAN0TY910e6yCJw81OZ4quhsHP7Q2 C9c+zHaw7cs4KlIUq7bhKKQbkdxg8KHvH5X0fUDZIGoYCvS33jEyBcoTF Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqAEABm0f09Io8UY/2dsb2JhbABCglO3ZoIJAQEBBBIBCQEQA1kCAQgRBAEBCwYXAQYBRQkIAgQBCggIGodsnmyXco9tYwSIWJthgWmCbw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,384,1330905600"; d="scan'208,217";a="9480435"
Received: from vla196-nat.cisco.com (HELO bgl-core-3.cisco.com) ([72.163.197.24]) by bgl-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Apr 2012 03:29:00 +0000
Received: from xbh-bgl-412.cisco.com (xbh-bgl-412.cisco.com [72.163.129.202]) by bgl-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q373T0Fm025913; Sat, 7 Apr 2012 03:29:00 GMT
Received: from xmb-bgl-41e.cisco.com ([72.163.129.220]) by xbh-bgl-412.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sat, 7 Apr 2012 08:59:00 +0530
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CD146E.92CA37B2"
Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2012 08:58:59 +0530
Message-ID: <3CF88B99A9ED504197498BC6F6F04B81060E5A9A@XMB-BGL-41E.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <DDF37113-DA02-47E4-BD64-828C9C5C384B@nominum.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] Call for Adoption, draft-troan-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-00 as WG item
Thread-Index: AQHNE1Jkl7tgtOxKmkWYH3w2Igkw0ZaOtlKw
References: <D9B5773329187548A0189ED6503667890B9F42CB@XMB-RCD-101.cisco.com> <DDF37113-DA02-47E4-BD64-828C9C5C384B@nominum.com>
From: "Gaurav Halwasia (ghalwasi)" <ghalwasi@cisco.com>
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>, dhcwg@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Apr 2012 03:29:00.0966 (UTC) FILETIME=[930CCC60:01CD146E]
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Call for Adoption, draft-troan-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-00 as WG item
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2012 03:29:09 -0000

I support adopting this document as a DHC WG item.

 

Thanks,

Gaurav

 

From: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Ted Lemon
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 11:05 PM
To: dhcwg@ietf.org WG
Subject: [dhcwg] Call for Adoption,
draft-troan-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-00 as WG item

 

On Apr 5, 2012, at 1:25 PM, Bernie Volz (volz) <volz@cisco.com> wrote:

	At the Paris IETF-83 DHC WG meeting there was a lot of support
for (and I believe no opposition) adopting this as a DHC WG item.

	 

	I kindly request that we adopt this document as a DHC WG work
item.

 

This draft documents issues that have come up involving interactions
between prefix delegation and regular IP address allocation in practice.
If you would like the working group to work on documenting this, please
signify by responding to this message in the affirmative.   If you don't
think we should work on it, please respond in the negative.   If you
have no opinion, please do not respond.

 

We will determine consensus on Thursday, April 19.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email