IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-addr-notification - Respond by September 13, 2023

Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> Thu, 14 September 2023 10:10 UTC

Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F152CC14CE22 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 03:10:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=employees.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SUEFs9WUeZci for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 03:10:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from proxmox01.kjsl.com (proxmox01.kjsl.com [204.87.183.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34FCDC14F74A for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 03:10:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from proxmox01.kjsl.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox01.kjsl.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id D7A17E5976; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 10:10:44 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=employees.org; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type :date:from:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=prox2023; bh=6G8zdJmgpqzQmwBV G8k+9I8KBmrT1L77Zi4XZg9YMc8=; b=ZxuDskK7tRKSbhsbQTousL9E2VybJ6x+ V1aljAJxkL9Cd0uUFncuRbDbJ3piAdKQkK6qlMVQK6dPCK6l/fkVckUVnWZWUWqj onkEZpEGSneXtFGO/ZvaBTpl738mpn6YM6cJPd0VPtuAwbY7iYFSW4av4JCvPE7W ltz3thduOSuXkif+K/mr6iyGt0GC03HiHAANA+OF52j286F4lldo1j48XwPFV35R 2B6ffjVgjcay9ZeL3+dpDyDUDm3PUXY6zwdan3jE1PCyFhL4wqyhgNOKnna5tEd4 nCzNvhCqU9aAKFRPF0OVEdYOxlnkOeGBl+wIV06WGrCrB++ljn/Sjw==
Received: from clarinet.employees.org (clarinet.employees.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by proxmox01.kjsl.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id B98E7E5969; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 10:10:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (77.16.214.56.tmi.telenormobil.no [77.16.214.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by clarinet.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EEE8F4E11BDA; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 10:10:43 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.700.6\))
From: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAFU7BATFx-yW9p88BLOMCarps92ejj4zYkvJB=BBtPqOy9QD3A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 12:10:30 +0200
Cc: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>, dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <DA08259F-B3AF-43CD-858C-5EBC399D20A7@employees.org>
References: <CAKD1Yr3AEOa_7dKM15g+z6ZPDApZz08vgCS4kn9Uvi=+B9Dthg@mail.gmail.com> <3F659608-5298-42B3-9403-2C2A170DFCB3@employees.org> <CAKD1Yr3no4WQ6-dsTYVNswfdT85zmg4fHXvLJPMa--ZT9=h6Og@mail.gmail.com> <A675F57A-7FDA-4011-A100-AA3CDA52A323@employees.org> <A87EAA8A-0A80-4FCF-BEB9-6C19022751E2@employees.org> <CAKD1Yr1qs_+Y+Eb+oSjYQ6-033anRkn3d_fcWXcZ6s5mCA-_aA@mail.gmail.com> <4705B18E-E96E-4EED-8CDC-70431600F59F@employees.org> <CAKD1Yr0BGoZNKgaO5wRVg9V2Cs6swj+POnVj+7hoPixkdByxug@mail.gmail.com> <98972EEB-EB29-4DDD-AF07-B4848D406C96@employees.org> <CAFU7BATFx-yW9p88BLOMCarps92ejj4zYkvJB=BBtPqOy9QD3A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.700.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/BLlmUL5NtwdiYOgtRrdtceqctBs>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-addr-notification - Respond by September 13, 2023
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Dynamic Host Configuration <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 10:10:49 -0000

Jen,

>>> This really needs to be validated by enterprise operators before proceeding.
> 
> That's why we have asked for early allocation and WGLC. At least one
> enterprise operator is very much interested in deploying this.
> 
>> I’ll leave it at that. But I would strongly suggest we hear from the Enterprise operator community.
> 
> As an enterprise operator I support that proposal (as you can probably
> tell from the 'authors' section ;-P)

Yeah, as you probably would guess I would like to see input from someone different than Google IT.
The vendor who is also the main culprit for why the address assignment situation is as hopeless as it is.

O.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email