IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-addr-notification - Respond by September 13, 2023

Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com> Thu, 14 September 2023 10:18 UTC

Return-Path: <furry13@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E4F1C151545 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 03:18:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.858
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.858 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yN_EI7lv5nxP for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 03:18:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x231.google.com (mail-lj1-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::231]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86FE2C15152B for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 03:18:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x231.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2bcd7a207f7so11645141fa.3 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 03:18:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1694686734; x=1695291534; darn=ietf.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=ApmKhlq65c22kTUyuvVWCoScqvdWBdKUyJ8esJmqlhw=; b=H6n/You2DbvS3sDlouiwxzLCR0u+Q1o1ZpMv/HfCDUrER6F6yeHqF/a7Lktcyn7+cr WYLWcG2KiQVYBASfzwycxG54y9dz5uJ27PzLStgvCR2nol9p4CqzbnXjrbBygrhKJzNu yZuRoxEz6Tx1WlkYwKPu2S2j3Y5FdPvxsn9HRksXsOWV4xpZ2bvLbE3oWINyt5VRwMcm b77OsfbayXJGJExoWJU67Nocnppgs6VDOyzP/E0GoXAvQc2m7/wakEg+nLKUJOgYQZsp iAxkCnoreSTCjxIX7d/+kIU6w3eK7C18xhuYJaUOCHv5mk4uPb5phwLIgL6BQ90eGFxN Q4Mw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1694686734; x=1695291534; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ApmKhlq65c22kTUyuvVWCoScqvdWBdKUyJ8esJmqlhw=; b=IPO83GjdJqoNeMdUxI0MRYPLPYhv3EqrRbjkDVuvTbRC08caAcsKcKXzb9u92FujIe KiRMIDUCoA6/uJGXyoPBiEFatZ64oYoruFd1kAcpmE+KWJKTzVKGJVt4nUUwjO49gFqV BcJYKjk9Mx7gbBI3HVjGjgO8bAU4W7q5j7jO2n5GUitJQs7FK7DJ118ACwrwaMcwfbB1 WnLGplOTlehIaOQcUK8FduXLszHdxwMz8+rqC+rn1pZC+B8Mvdg9yZbuKIykD2gCEy9e IhSXFt5MePjwMc45GehWrK92k+dSxBN0fOVwSu5SdR0t7M2lLHGIAnLBJriMOpJbhHx6 STkg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyuPg9Mle29X1ofsi9kv51ICeb/J60lndrWQPZIpxsJdGTKuRpo Bl7e/s7LuHbaulWscKdB/UNlvTbUFjkhItDDEW8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHhDru9Yx2lsjAZ7G6oqWD8XwmCiTaVElj4EaLzRDb8Fi3HimLwnqXQoaBh8RTqUL87G5qYOR7nIgnu8heAOmY=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:3c0b:0:b0:2bb:b1da:27be with SMTP id j11-20020a2e3c0b000000b002bbb1da27bemr4381540lja.45.1694686733378; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 03:18:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAKD1Yr3AEOa_7dKM15g+z6ZPDApZz08vgCS4kn9Uvi=+B9Dthg@mail.gmail.com> <3F659608-5298-42B3-9403-2C2A170DFCB3@employees.org> <CAKD1Yr3no4WQ6-dsTYVNswfdT85zmg4fHXvLJPMa--ZT9=h6Og@mail.gmail.com> <A675F57A-7FDA-4011-A100-AA3CDA52A323@employees.org> <A87EAA8A-0A80-4FCF-BEB9-6C19022751E2@employees.org> <CAKD1Yr1qs_+Y+Eb+oSjYQ6-033anRkn3d_fcWXcZ6s5mCA-_aA@mail.gmail.com> <4705B18E-E96E-4EED-8CDC-70431600F59F@employees.org> <CAKD1Yr0BGoZNKgaO5wRVg9V2Cs6swj+POnVj+7hoPixkdByxug@mail.gmail.com> <98972EEB-EB29-4DDD-AF07-B4848D406C96@employees.org> <CAFU7BATFx-yW9p88BLOMCarps92ejj4zYkvJB=BBtPqOy9QD3A@mail.gmail.com> <DA08259F-B3AF-43CD-858C-5EBC399D20A7@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <DA08259F-B3AF-43CD-858C-5EBC399D20A7@employees.org>
From: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 03:18:42 -0700
Message-ID: <CAFU7BASuLfBB0TswJdza2xtwhXqiZ=HHt-EvsofAK9zSp5G9TA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
Cc: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>, dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/SD75Yz3YGfHRb5ksvmSUkNeGBFI>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-addr-notification - Respond by September 13, 2023
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Dynamic Host Configuration <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 10:18:57 -0000

On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 3:10 AM Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> wrote:
> >>> This really needs to be validated by enterprise operators before proceeding.
> >
> > That's why we have asked for early allocation and WGLC. At least one
> > enterprise operator is very much interested in deploying this.
> >
> >> I’ll leave it at that. But I would strongly suggest we hear from the Enterprise operator community.
> >
> > As an enterprise operator I support that proposal (as you can probably
> > tell from the 'authors' section ;-P)
>
> Yeah, as you probably would guess I would like to see input from someone different than Google IT.
> The vendor who is also the main culprit for why the address assignment situation is as hopeless as it is.

This is becoming more like a topic for v6ops, but...My point is that
even if all enterprise devices support DHCPv6 IA_NA (let's say there
are no Android devices on the network), that it's not possible to
build an DHCPv6-only enterprise network. SLAAC is required and will be
required at least for some time. So it's not a matter of supporting
DHCPv6 IA_NA or not.

-- 
SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email