IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-nisconfig-05.txt

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 04 February 2004 22:57 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA05667 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 17:57:03 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AoVwi-00071q-GQ for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 17:56:36 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i14Muaj6027012 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 17:56:36 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AoVwi-00071b-Bh for dhcwg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 17:56:36 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA05663 for <dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 17:56:32 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AoVwf-0003uC-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 17:56:33 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AoVvj-0003od-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 17:55:35 -0500
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AoVvC-0003jC-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 17:55:02 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AoVvD-0006sj-GN; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 17:55:03 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AoVue-0006s3-Rj for dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 17:54:28 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA05548 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 17:54:24 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AoVuc-0003hO-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 17:54:26 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AoVtf-0003cb-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 17:53:28 -0500
Received: from toccata.fugue.com ([204.152.186.142]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AoVsv-0003Y8-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 17:52:41 -0500
Received: from [10.0.1.2] (dsl093-187-232.chi2.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.187.232]) by toccata.fugue.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A3CA22DE7A; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 16:42:36 -0600 (CST)
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20040204170501.04687cb0@flask.cisco.com>
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20040204170501.04687cb0@flask.cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v612)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <D6A2A6F8-5764-11D8-A1C7-000A95D9C74C@fugue.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-nisconfig-05.txt
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 16:52:41 -0600
To: Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.612)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Feb 4, 2004, at 4:16 PM, Ralph Droms wrote:
> For the DHCPv6 DNS servers option, the WG opted for alternative 1, 
> which
> seems to me to be the right thing to do for the NIS servers option, as 
> well.

That seems right.   There is no need for additional complexity here.


_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email