Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-nisconfig-05.txt

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Mon, 09 February 2004 20:44 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA10541 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 15:44:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AqIGT-0007fp-CQ for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 15:44:22 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i19KiLXq029493 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 15:44:21 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AqIGT-0007fc-7B for dhcwg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 15:44:21 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA10535 for <dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 15:44:18 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AqIGR-0007W9-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 15:44:19 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AqIFW-0007Rg-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 15:43:23 -0500
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AqIFJ-0007My-00 for dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 15:43:09 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AqIFB-0007PO-Ar; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 15:43:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AqIEX-0007Ot-LE for dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 15:42:21 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA10448 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 15:42:19 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AqIEW-0007Lt-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 15:42:20 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AqIDa-0007HG-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 15:41:22 -0500
Received: from toccata.fugue.com ([204.152.186.142]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AqID5-0007CX-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 15:40:51 -0500
Received: from [10.0.1.3] (dsl093-187-232.chi2.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.187.232]) by toccata.fugue.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3FA83A18DF; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 14:29:54 -0600 (CST)
In-Reply-To: <2435506122.1076323711@localhost>
References: <000801c3ef35$831e44d0$6401a8c0@BVolz> <2435506122.1076323711@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v612)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <3E2D169E-5B40-11D8-93AF-000A95D9C74C@fugue.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-nisconfig-05.txt
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 14:40:48 -0600
To: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.612)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Feb 9, 2004, at 12:48 PM, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
> --On 9. februar 2004 12:52 -0500 Bernie Volz <volz@metrocast.net> 
> wrote:
>
>> And, DHCP is really the Dynamic Interface Configuration Protocol. Why?
>> Because everything we do is INTERFACE specific. Perhaps, even more
>> correctly, would be to say it is the Dynamic Interface and Transport
>> Configuration Protocol (because we're also IPv4 or IPv6 specific).
>
> Then stop trying to configure SNTP and NIS.

This is a non-problem.   If the protocols are different between v4 and 
v6, they're different protocols, and shouldn't be represented by the 
same DHCPv6 option anyway.   So the solution is to treat them that way. 
   Practically speaking, if you have a dual-stack client, you're going 
to configure it with DHCPv4 and DHCPv6, so you can get your NISv4 
address from DHCPv4.   The way to write this in a standard if we 
decided to would simply be that the IP addresses for equivalent servers 
provided by DHCPv6 supersede those provided by DHCPv4.   NISv4 and 
NISv6 aren't equivalent, so there's no problem.


_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg