Re: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption-08.txt
"Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> Sun, 12 June 2011 20:03 UTC
Return-Path: <volz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32ED211E8130 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 13:03:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v25A3ZAroPaz for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 13:03:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-1.cisco.com (sj-iport-1.cisco.com [171.71.176.70]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF9B711E80E9 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 13:03:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=volz@cisco.com; l=4193; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1307909035; x=1309118635; h=mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date: message-id:in-reply-to:references:from:to:cc; bh=NEDrdGz+xr/iRfjoj6nF3/iPDh6nW8xCk1PeVI8LUYQ=; b=MdVLoygkiuze0yEcoSsQ0S2SGK860bFaHFIeTBAE8nZY2emtEiz6zacH LVei88XsLpJ2Go1twvbhgoUbstZqtP306lQzIJXZ9ZmWLQSWZr2XnQV6n Du1NNPuOE5OMAbpInSgzObcxCYfJ+Y0+ZDw6XW4WsUCdwpcxjGq8nlntb c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhcBAPga9U2tJV2a/2dsb2JhbABSl1eOeHeqbZx8hiQEhw2Of4sj
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,355,1304294400"; d="scan'208";a="464092214"
Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([173.37.93.154]) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 Jun 2011 20:03:55 +0000
Received: from xbh-rcd-102.cisco.com (xbh-rcd-102.cisco.com [72.163.62.139]) by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p5CK3tWd003897; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 20:03:55 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-101.cisco.com ([72.163.62.143]) by xbh-rcd-102.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:03:55 -0500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:03:51 -0500
Message-ID: <D9B5773329187548A0189ED65036678907F8BE68@XMB-RCD-101.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <31D55C4D55BEED48A4459EB64567589A115E3C9F2B@BLRKECMBX02.ad.infosys.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption-08.txt
Thread-Index: Acwi2YMzGEKrsYkCTqOR+0a/a2b14QEgKCViAHfPjsA=
References: <20110604170424.3363.68771.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <31D55C4D55BEED48A4459EB64567589A115E3C9F2B@BLRKECMBX02.ad.infosys.com>
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: Bharat Joshi <bharat_joshi@infosys.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Jun 2011 20:03:55.0054 (UTC) FILETIME=[DB92C4E0:01CC293B]
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org, "Mark Stapp (mjs)" <mjs@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption-08.txt
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 20:03:57 -0000
Hi ... I've decided to add the DHC WG as this is a document being worked on there. Personally, I'd switch section 3.1 and 3.2 (bulk LQ is a much stronger argument for this). And, I doubt the IESG will be happy with this document and leaving the actual identifier as completely opaque! How would this identifying data be assured to be unique if it is just defined as a 'series of octets'? I also fail to see why the DUID isn't being recommended as the standard format for this relay identifier? See RFC 5460 section 5.4, OPTION_RELAY_ID. And, thus do we really need a type field in the option? Isn't just a DUID sufficient? I'd also say that for "compatibility" with DHCPv6, using the DUID as the relay identifier too would be really convenient and appropriate. This also means section 6 can probably be significantly scaled back - the only issue is the unicast RENEW. - Bernie -----Original Message----- From: Bharat Joshi [mailto:bharat_joshi@infosys.com] Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 6:36 AM To: Bernie Volz (volz) Subject: FW: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption-08.txt Bernie, Mark told me that you had reviewed this draft and had provided valuable inputs. We have made quiet a few changes from the last revision. Can you please review this new revision and send any comments to DHC mailing list? We need this draft for our 'DHCPv4 Bulk lease query' draft. Thanks in advance, Bharat ________________________________________ From: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org [dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.org [internet-drafts@ietf.org] Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2011 10:34 PM To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org Subject: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption-08.txt A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Dynamic Host Configuration Working Group of the IETF. Title : The DHCPv4 Relay Agent Identifier Suboption Author(s) : Bharat Joshi Mark Stapp Filename : draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption-08.txt Pages : 8 Date : 2011-06-04 This draft defines a new Relay Agent Identifier suboption for the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol's (DHCP) Relay Agent Information option. The suboption carries a value that uniquely identifies the relay agent device within the administrative domain. The value is typically administratively-configured in the relay agent. The suboption allows a DHCP relay agent to include the identifier in the DHCP messages it sends. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption-08 .txt Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption-08. txt _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg **************** CAUTION - Disclaimer ***************** This e-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended solely for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by e-mail and delete the original message. Further, you are not to copy, disclose, or distribute this e-mail or its contents to any other person and any such actions are unlawful. This e-mail may contain viruses. Infosys has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, but is not liable for any damage you may sustain as a result of any virus in this e-mail. You should carry out your own virus checks before opening the e-mail or attachment. Infosys reserves the right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from this e-mail address. Messages sent to or from this e-mail address may be stored on the Infosys e-mail system. ***INFOSYS******** End of Disclaimer ********INFOSYS***
- [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-subop… internet-drafts
- [dhcwg] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-s… Bharat Joshi
- Re: [dhcwg] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-… Pavan Kurapati
- Re: [dhcwg] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-… Bharat Joshi
- Re: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-s… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-s… Bharat Joshi
- Re: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-s… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-s… Leaf yeh
- Re: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-s… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-s… Bharat Joshi
- Re: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-s… Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-s… Bharat Joshi
- Re: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-s… Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-s… Mark Stapp
- Re: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-s… Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-s… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-s… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-s… Bharat Joshi
- Re: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-s… Mark Stapp
- Re: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-s… Bernie Volz (volz)