IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption-08.txt

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Mon, 13 June 2011 17:34 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EEEC11E8176 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:34:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4K+7q1OvDLa0 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:34:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og101.obsmtp.com (exprod7og101.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.155]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC0E011E8177 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:34:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob101.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTfZKGEpaKTa/kcxaNUXRkOoFKvY2XhEI@postini.com; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:34:16 PDT
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEFE11B8514 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:34:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (webmail.nominum.com [64.89.228.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "webmail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E799F190052; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:34:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
Received: from kali.ddns.nominum.com (64.89.225.6) by exchange-01.win.nominum.com (64.89.228.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.176.0; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:34:15 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1237.1)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <E1CE3E6E6D4E1C438B0ADC9FFFA345EAD39BCA@SZXEML514-MBS.china.huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:34:15 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <AD643BAF-170D-44CF-8531-AA220106D8DD@nominum.com>
References: <20110604170424.3363.68771.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <31D55C4D55BEED48A4459EB64567589A115E3C9F15@BLRKECMBX02.ad.infosys.com> <BANLkTi=WiPMfR1cFmwSEehjzAWk97efBMQ@mail.gmail.com> <31D55C4D55BEED48A4459EB64567589A115E3C9F1B@BLRKECMBX02.ad.infosys.com> <9B800A80-B90E-47DF-91B7-19DECBC32A5E@nominum.com> <31D55C4D55BEED48A4459EB64567589A115E3C9F1D@BLRKECMBX02.ad.infosys.com> <243EA4AA-9165-4BC5-BE81-50E219A5F35E@nominum.com> <E1CE3E6E6D4E1C438B0ADC9FFFA345EAD39BCA@SZXEML514-MBS.china.huawei.com>
To: Leaf yeh <leaf.y.yeh@huawei.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1237.1)
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption-08.txt
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:34:17 -0000

On Jun 8, 2011, at 7:29 PM, Leaf yeh wrote:
> Supposed you're talking about the space shortage of the DHCPv4 option codes.

Yes, sorry, I have IPv6 on the brain at the moment, and forgot that we were talking about a DHCPv4 option.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email