Re: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption-08.txt

[Bharat Joshi <[e-mail]>]

> >       Yes. 'type' field has been kept there to keep any future extensibility possible.
> 
> It seems to me that the semantics of DUID are sufficiently different than the semantics of this option that it would not be useful to combine them.   Do you see some other use for the type field?
> 

At present, we do not have any other use for this field. This 'type' was inspired from the previous revision of this document and we decided to keep it there thinking that more type of relay-ids may come in future.

Regards,
Bharat
**************** CAUTION - Disclaimer *****************
This e-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended solely 
for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please 
notify the sender by e-mail and delete the original message. Further, you are not 
to copy, disclose, or distribute this e-mail or its contents to any other person and 
any such actions are unlawful. This e-mail may contain viruses. Infosys has taken 
every reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, but is not liable for any damage 
you may sustain as a result of any virus in this e-mail. You should carry out your 
own virus checks before opening the e-mail or attachment. Infosys reserves the 
right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from this e-mail 
address. Messages sent to or from this e-mail address may be stored on the 
Infosys e-mail system.
***INFOSYS******** End of Disclaimer ********INFOSYS***