Re: [Dime] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-korhonen-dime-mip6-feature-bits-01

[Behcet Sarikaya <[e-mail]>]

----- Original Message ----
> From: jouni korhonen <[e-mail]>
> To: Julien Bournelle <[e-mail]>
> Cc: Behcet Sarikaya <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2009 3:24:58 AM
> Subject: Re: [Dime] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-korhonen-dime-mip6-feature-bits-01
> 
> Hi Julien,
> 
> Well, the IANA allocation rules were crafted so that other SDOs could easily 
> allocate their own flags once they document flag usage (the document can be any 
> publicly available proper spec/document, not just RFC). Having said that, 
> allocating flags "ahead" without relevant documentation which properly describe 
> the use and need is not really what we want.. And having said that, I basically 
> self-conclude most flags the current I-D proposes are not needed ;)


This is a good point.
In the document I mentioned one of them:
 IP4_HOA_SUPPORTED (0x0000020000000000)
 
is being used though.
 
Regards,
 
Behcet

> 
> Cheers,
>     Jouni
> 
> 
> On Jul 8, 2009, at 10:53 AM, Julien Bournelle wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> > 
> >  one question maybe is if it is the IETF or IANA which will be used to 
> register specifc SDO flags ?
> > 
> >  Maybe we could have a specific range for such allocation ?
> > 
> >  Any comments ?
> > 
> >  Julien
> > 
> > On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 8:05 AM, jouni korhonen wrote:
> > 
> > Could you point me at the relevant Wimax documents regarding the flags below?
> > 
> > Cheers,
> >        Jouni
> > 
> > 
> > On Jul 7, 2009, at 5:39 PM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > Hi Jouni,
> >  Can you please add
> > IP4_IN_IP6_TUNNELING_SUPPORTED flag (which could be defined as:
> > IP4_IN_IP6_TUNNELING_SUPPORTED (0x0000000000000100)
> > )
> > 
> > The need for this came out in a contribution we made to WiMAX NWG's IPv4/v6 
> Transition subteam on the scenarios for DSMIP.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Behcet
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ----- Original Message ----
> > From: jouni korhonen 
> > To: [e-mail]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 4:55:36 AM
> > Subject: [Dime] Fwd: New Version Notification for 
> draft-korhonen-dime-mip6-feature-bits-01
> > 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > I have updated the additional feature bits draft. I did remove some stuff so
> > that the draft now only reserves MIP6-Feature-Vector flag bits and nothing 
> more.
> > I'll forward the draft soon to RFC editor so if anyone has comments, please be
> > quick :)
> > 
> > Cheers,
> >    Jouni
> > 
> > Begin forwarded message:
> > 
> > From: IETF I-D Submission Tool
> > Date: June 10, 2009 12:26:53 PM GMT+03:00
> > To: [e-mail]
> > Subject: New Version Notification for
> > draft-korhonen-dime-mip6-feature-bits-01
> > 
> > 
> > A new version of I-D, draft-korhonen-dime-mip6-feature-bits-01.txt has been
> > successfuly submitted by Jouni Korhonen and posted to the IETF repository.
> > 
> > Filename:    draft-korhonen-dime-mip6-feature-bits
> > Revision:    01
> > Title:        Diameter MIP6 Feature Vector Additional Bit Allocations
> > Creation_date:    2009-06-10
> > WG ID:        Independent Submission
> > Number_of_pages: 5
> > 
> > Abstract:
> > During the Mobile IPv6 Split Scenario bootstrapping the Mobile IPv6
> > Home Agent and the Authentication, Authorization, and Accounting
> > server may exchange a set of authorized mobility capabilities.  This
> > document defines new mobility capability flags that are used to
> > authorize per Mobile Node route optimization, Multiple Care-of
> > Address and user plane traffic encryption support.  Furthermore, this
> > document also defines a capability flag of indicating whether the
> > Home Agent is authorized to act as a stand alone Virtual Private
> > Network gateway.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > The IETF Secretariat.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > DiME mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > DiME mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
> >