Re: [Dime] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-korhonen-dime-mip6-feature-bits-01
Julien Bournelle <julien.bournelle@gmail.com> Thu, 09 July 2009 07:28 UTC
Return-Path: <julien.bournelle@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16CF33A67DD for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 00:28:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.569
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.569 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.029, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f27UTH6xW7uY for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 00:28:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-bw0-f225.google.com (mail-bw0-f225.google.com [209.85.218.225]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F6F728C14C for <dime@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 00:28:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bwz25 with SMTP id 25so3337781bwz.37 for <dime@ietf.org>; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:28:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Orn8+Box9NYDu3BstbbhE4HGni683dBxudlcX/sWAR8=; b=EnsEtxI9zg7aLZ4FbM5XedWSiGAKLxILJb7pLHKf9+fVHXPA0oJ2QAw2L6rKvTlIAr aPqJ+xx/Ijuitcb7X3wnYcfUiblUAUo7X+I6TQHxuQtOzfBExzIoMRodE7JaetPprV5P mHZfcVj3gzD61wIpeoBODotSV1/CAI5UoXzcs=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=MW1ARrQHkSVpGSINNwx/3xu6HmXrgplb9sd6oEuVlwptBdYqRDXI6WYIUkrysHxi+F 0leuQlwwvyDDNSCRJZOxm7WKptqkWicDCsCeWm1rshewGa5zj1uWcjwJyyHW/BFi+fj3 +B8qbFREhMD1CL3riVWa+M/CyfBs76OBqiiYU=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.58.9 with SMTP id e9mr439532bkh.23.1247124537990; Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:28:57 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AE94132F-1C99-4E10-9B36-2FD7E0AA0C99@gmail.com>
References: <20090610092653.601A33A6E07@core3.amsl.com> <1CE00542-32BF-4344-884C-CCDC763FA853@gmail.com> <605467.44209.qm@web111405.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <0E6B99B1-F87F-47FD-9C3B-9417AFED18E5@gmail.com> <5e2406980907080053s27947281i495195c060b10976@mail.gmail.com> <121392FB-EC60-4651-B60C-9FB4E65CE5CB@gmail.com> <5e2406980907080503w1eb1ad03o89a4601375c74ecb@mail.gmail.com> <AE94132F-1C99-4E10-9B36-2FD7E0AA0C99@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 09:28:57 +0200
Message-ID: <5e2406980907090028i5ba97861m77cc03dd7e3e0a83@mail.gmail.com>
From: Julien Bournelle <julien.bournelle@gmail.com>
To: jouni <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001636c5bcc513df4e046e40cffd"
Cc: dime@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Dime] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-korhonen-dime-mip6-feature-bits-01
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 07:28:36 -0000
Hello, On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 9:03 PM, jouni <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Julien, > > On Jul 8, 2009, at 3:03 PM, Julien Bournelle wrote: > > Hi jouni, >> >> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 10:24 AM, jouni korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> Hi Julien, >> >> Well, the IANA allocation rules were crafted so that other SDOs could >> easily allocate their own flags once they document flag usage (the document >> can be any publicly available proper spec/document, not just RFC). Having >> said that, allocating flags "ahead" without relevant documentation which >> properly describe the use and need is not really what we want. And having >> said that, I basically self-conclude most flags the current I-D proposes are >> not needed ;) >> >> >> not sure to catch your conclusion ! :) >> > > ;) Meaning.. SDOs could (should) go and allocate feature vector flag bits > on their own directly from IANA, once they have appropriate documentation.. > without getting involved in IETF WG level process. ok, I see. Maybe we could add a little section explaining this. > > Regarding the proper documentation, I realize that > draft-korhonen-dime-mip6-feature-bits does not really do a good job at > explaining "use & need" for some flags it aims to allocate. i'll re-read the current draft and provide comments ASAP. regards, Julien > > > > JOuni > > > > >> >> >> Cheers, >> Jouni >> >> >> >> On Jul 8, 2009, at 10:53 AM, Julien Bournelle wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> one question maybe is if it is the IETF or IANA which will be used to >> register specifc SDO flags ? >> >> Maybe we could have a specific range for such allocation ? >> >> Any comments ? >> >> Julien >> >> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 8:05 AM, jouni korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Could you point me at the relevant Wimax documents regarding the flags >> below? >> >> Cheers, >> Jouni >> >> >> On Jul 7, 2009, at 5:39 PM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote: >> >> >> Hi Jouni, >> Can you please add >> IP4_IN_IP6_TUNNELING_SUPPORTED flag (which could be defined as: >> IP4_IN_IP6_TUNNELING_SUPPORTED (0x0000000000000100) >> ) >> >> The need for this came out in a contribution we made to WiMAX NWG's >> IPv4/v6 Transition subteam on the scenarios for DSMIP. >> >> Regards, >> >> Behcet >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ---- >> From: jouni korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> >> To: dime@ietf.org >> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 4:55:36 AM >> Subject: [Dime] Fwd: New Version Notification for >> draft-korhonen-dime-mip6-feature-bits-01 >> >> Hi all, >> >> I have updated the additional feature bits draft. I did remove some stuff >> so >> that the draft now only reserves MIP6-Feature-Vector flag bits and nothing >> more. >> I'll forward the draft soon to RFC editor so if anyone has comments, >> please be >> quick :) >> >> Cheers, >> Jouni >> >> Begin forwarded message: >> >> From: IETF I-D Submission Tool >> Date: June 10, 2009 12:26:53 PM GMT+03:00 >> To: jouni.nospam@gmail.com >> Subject: New Version Notification for >> draft-korhonen-dime-mip6-feature-bits-01 >> >> >> A new version of I-D, draft-korhonen-dime-mip6-feature-bits-01.txt has >> been >> successfuly submitted by Jouni Korhonen and posted to the IETF repository. >> >> Filename: draft-korhonen-dime-mip6-feature-bits >> Revision: 01 >> Title: Diameter MIP6 Feature Vector Additional Bit Allocations >> Creation_date: 2009-06-10 >> WG ID: Independent Submission >> Number_of_pages: 5 >> >> Abstract: >> During the Mobile IPv6 Split Scenario bootstrapping the Mobile IPv6 >> Home Agent and the Authentication, Authorization, and Accounting >> server may exchange a set of authorized mobility capabilities. This >> document defines new mobility capability flags that are used to >> authorize per Mobile Node route optimization, Multiple Care-of >> Address and user plane traffic encryption support. Furthermore, this >> document also defines a capability flag of indicating whether the >> Home Agent is authorized to act as a stand alone Virtual Private >> Network gateway. >> >> >> >> The IETF Secretariat. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> DiME mailing list >> DiME@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> DiME mailing list >> DiME@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime >> >> >> >> >
- [Dime] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ko… jouni korhonen
- Re: [Dime] Fwd: New Version Notification fordraft… Qin Wu
- Re: [Dime] Fwd: New Version Notification fordraft… jouni korhonen
- Re: [Dime] Fwd: New Version Notification for draf… Vijay Devarapalli
- Re: [Dime] Fwd: New Version Notification for draf… Vijay Devarapalli
- Re: [Dime] Fwd: New Version Notification fordraft… Qin Wu
- Re: [Dime] Fwd: New Version Notification for draf… jouni korhonen
- Re: [Dime] Fwd: New Version Notification for draf… jouni korhonen
- Re: [Dime] Fwd: New Version Notification for draf… Vijay Devarapalli
- Re: [Dime] Fwd: New Version Notification for draf… Vijay Devarapalli
- Re: [Dime] Fwd: New Version Notification for draf… jouni korhonen
- Re: [Dime] Fwd: New Version Notification for draf… jouni korhonen
- Re: [Dime] Fwd: New Version Notification for draf… Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [Dime] Fwd: New Version Notification for draf… jouni
- Re: [Dime] Fwd: New Version Notification fordraft… Jinwei Xia
- Re: [Dime] Fwd: New Version Notification fordraft… Jinwei Xia
- Re: [Dime] Fwd: New Version Notification fordraft… jouni korhonen
- Re: [Dime] Fwd: New Version Notification for draf… Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [Dime] Fwd: New Version Notification for draf… jouni korhonen
- Re: [Dime] Fwd: New Version Notification for draf… Julien Bournelle
- Re: [Dime] Fwd: New Version Notification for draf… jouni korhonen
- Re: [Dime] Fwd: New Version Notification for draf… Julien Bournelle
- Re: [Dime] Fwd: New Version Notification for draf… Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [Dime] Fwd: New Version Notification for draf… jouni
- Re: [Dime] Fwd: New Version Notification for draf… Julien Bournelle