Re: [Dime] Fwd: New Version Notification fordraft-korhonen-dime-mip6-feature-bits-01

jouni korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Tue, 07 July 2009 11:27 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DC3928C45F for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 04:27:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.163
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.163 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.436, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J5cg0UjNHtdj for <dime@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 04:27:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ew0-f226.google.com (mail-ew0-f226.google.com [209.85.219.226]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8606628C447 for <dime@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 04:27:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ewy26 with SMTP id 26so497054ewy.37 for <dime@ietf.org>; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 04:27:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:cc:message-id:from:to :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:x-mailer; bh=wuDkGbMw0SxMK6o6Jt/s6I5/2EqahC1/r4YaPWmEDAU=; b=gwtiVFAwl5dJ57TsecTMrIWUnX48GCZzyEyC5x89B4T/KjZL+YsCrhoWqtEfasKBtz t9cz+uDFpS8pt34q9dAYx8GEci7BTsZA+oxUPxwEvKBvAYLaNKhf5avExZpPEBOlmpLQ Q9TgnIZYiBEHM0KlfWft3dIgiqBjZ+GsBpjHY=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=cc:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :x-mailer; b=HWCD6YyKz4u8wdr+4IPu7XUTU7ZVPPopHTDt4OA7MwfLkJPVodNAdGivS+VnUUtf5U +UbhpV53cPCeIjY1gRNyXwG3L1imQ2wVcHX0wzRVBb4IQGsrCLTWlZCU9iN3eWBHi5S+ Z01v9Bv9Uffu3v1ldo/u08jrrY9ET798S0tec=
Received: by 10.210.82.2 with SMTP id f2mr3885177ebb.2.1246966020564; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 04:27:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?10.254.0.54? ([192.100.123.77]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 5sm3594516eyh.10.2009.07.07.04.26.59 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 07 Jul 2009 04:27:00 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <AAF85A48-B1AD-4F07-BAD6-D33EB1C481E1@gmail.com>
From: jouni korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
To: Jinwei Xia <xiajinwei@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <003c01c9fec9$87837230$430ca40a@china.huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3)
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 14:26:57 +0300
References: <003c01c9fec9$87837230$430ca40a@china.huawei.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3)
Cc: dime@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Dime] Fwd: New Version Notification fordraft-korhonen-dime-mip6-feature-bits-01
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 11:27:19 -0000

Hi Jinwei,

On Jul 7, 2009, at 9:09 AM, Jinwei Xia wrote:

> Hi Jouni,
>
> 	Do you think it is better to mark this ID as updates of 5447?  With
> the stability of MCoA and DSMIP, both feature will be added in MIP  
> Diameter
> Application.

I don't think the draft would update RFC5447. It just uses the IANA  
procedures defined there. If something would be updated that is the  
dime-mip6-split draft. However, that is the draft we purposely removed  
these flags and spun off the feature-bits draft.


>
> 	However if you take PMIP feature into account, I support this ID is
> independent from RFC5447 and Dime-PMIPv6. In such case, IMHO

dime-pmip6 draft already defines its own feature bits.


>
> "Bulk_Termination" and "Bulk_Re_Registration" should be involved in  
> as PMIP
> feature.


Do you suggest adding feature bits for bulk operations (the recent  
work in netext)?

Cheers,
	Jouni


>
>
>
> BR
>
> 	Jinwei
>
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have updated the additional feature bits draft. I did
>> remove some stuff so that the draft now only reserves
>> MIP6-Feature-Vector flag bits and nothing more. I'll forward
>> the draft soon to RFC editor so if anyone has comments,
>> please be quick :)
>>
>> Cheers,
>> 	Jouni
>>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>>> From: IETF I-D Submission Tool <idsubmission@ietf.org>
>>> Date: June 10, 2009 12:26:53 PM GMT+03:00
>>> To: jouni.nospam@gmail.com
>>> Subject: New Version Notification for  draft-korhonen-dime-mip6-
>>> feature-bits-01
>>>
>>>
>>> A new version of I-D, draft-korhonen-dime-mip6-feature-bits-01.txt
>>> has been successfuly submitted by Jouni Korhonen and posted to the
>>> IETF repository.
>>>
>>> Filename:	 draft-korhonen-dime-mip6-feature-bits
>>> Revision:	 01
>>> Title:		 Diameter MIP6 Feature Vector
>> Additional Bit Allocations
>>> Creation_date:	 2009-06-10
>>> WG ID:		 Independent Submission
>>> Number_of_pages: 5
>>>
>>> Abstract:
>>> During the Mobile IPv6 Split Scenario bootstrapping the Mobile IPv6
>>> Home Agent and the Authentication, Authorization, and Accounting
>>> server may exchange a set of authorized mobility
>> capabilities.  This
>>> document defines new mobility capability flags that are used to
>>> authorize per Mobile Node route optimization, Multiple
>> Care-of Address
>>> and user plane traffic encryption support.  Furthermore,
>> this document
>>> also defines a capability flag of indicating whether the
>> Home Agent is
>>> authorized to act as a stand alone Virtual Private Network gateway.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The IETF Secretariat.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> DiME mailing list
>> DiME@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
>