Re: [Dime] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-korhonen-dime-mip6-feature-bits-01

Hi jouni,

On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 10:24 AM, jouni korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi Julien,
>
> Well, the IANA allocation rules were crafted so that other SDOs could
> easily allocate their own flags once they document flag usage (the document
> can be any publicly available proper spec/document, not just RFC). Having
> said that, allocating flags "ahead" without relevant documentation which
> properly describe the use and need is not really what we want. And having
> said that, I basically self-conclude most flags the current I-D proposes are
> not needed ;)

 not sure to catch your conclusion ! :)

>
>
> Cheers,
>        Jouni
>
>
>
> On Jul 8, 2009, at 10:53 AM, Julien Bournelle wrote:
>
>  Hello,
>>
>>  one question maybe is if it is the IETF or IANA which will be used to
>> register specifc SDO flags ?
>>
>>  Maybe we could have a specific range for such allocation ?
>>
>>  Any comments ?
>>
>>  Julien
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 8:05 AM, jouni korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Could you point me at the relevant Wimax documents regarding the flags
>> below?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>       Jouni
>>
>>
>> On Jul 7, 2009, at 5:39 PM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi Jouni,
>>  Can you please add
>> IP4_IN_IP6_TUNNELING_SUPPORTED flag (which could be defined as:
>> IP4_IN_IP6_TUNNELING_SUPPORTED (0x0000000000000100)
>> )
>>
>> The need for this came out in a contribution we made to WiMAX NWG's
>> IPv4/v6 Transition subteam on the scenarios for DSMIP.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Behcet
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: jouni korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
>> To: dime@ietf.org
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 4:55:36 AM
>> Subject: [Dime] Fwd: New Version Notification for
>> draft-korhonen-dime-mip6-feature-bits-01
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have updated the additional feature bits draft. I did remove some stuff
>> so
>> that the draft now only reserves MIP6-Feature-Vector flag bits and nothing
>> more.
>> I'll forward the draft soon to RFC editor so if anyone has comments,
>> please be
>> quick :)
>>
>> Cheers,
>>   Jouni
>>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>> From: IETF I-D Submission Tool
>> Date: June 10, 2009 12:26:53 PM GMT+03:00
>> To: jouni.nospam@gmail.com
>> Subject: New Version Notification for
>> draft-korhonen-dime-mip6-feature-bits-01
>>
>>
>> A new version of I-D, draft-korhonen-dime-mip6-feature-bits-01.txt has
>> been
>> successfuly submitted by Jouni Korhonen and posted to the IETF repository.
>>
>> Filename:    draft-korhonen-dime-mip6-feature-bits
>> Revision:    01
>> Title:        Diameter MIP6 Feature Vector Additional Bit Allocations
>> Creation_date:    2009-06-10
>> WG ID:        Independent Submission
>> Number_of_pages: 5
>>
>> Abstract:
>> During the Mobile IPv6 Split Scenario bootstrapping the Mobile IPv6
>> Home Agent and the Authentication, Authorization, and Accounting
>> server may exchange a set of authorized mobility capabilities.  This
>> document defines new mobility capability flags that are used to
>> authorize per Mobile Node route optimization, Multiple Care-of
>> Address and user plane traffic encryption support.  Furthermore, this
>> document also defines a capability flag of indicating whether the
>> Home Agent is authorized to act as a stand alone Virtual Private
>> Network gateway.
>>
>>
>>
>> The IETF Secretariat.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> DiME mailing list
>> DiME@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> DiME mailing list
>> DiME@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
>>
>>
>