Re: [Dime] FW: Russ Housley's Discuss on draft-ietf-dime-pmip6-lr-09: (with DISCUSS)

I have entered these in the RFC Editor note. 

Thanks and Regards,

Dan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Elwyn Davies [mailto:elwynd@googlemail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 3:24 PM
> To: Qin Wu
> Cc: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); dime@ietf.org; draft-ietf-dime-pmip6-
> lr@tools.ietf.org; Glen Zorn;
> Subject: Re: [Dime] FW: Russ Housley's Discuss on draft-ietf-dime-
> pmip6-lr-09: (with DISCUSS)
> 
> Hi.
> 
> That seems to improved things except:
> 
> s1, para 1: The 'itself' is still unclear as to what it refers to.
> suggest s/itself/the same Mobile Access Gateway/.
> 
> s5.1, para 3: s/indicating Direct routing/indicating direct routing/
> 
> Regards,
> Elwyn
> 
> 
> 
> On 22/02/12 06:25, Qin Wu wrote:
> > Dan:
> >
> > We have fixed this part in the new version -10.
> >
> > Regards!
> > -Qin
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)"<dromasca@avaya.com>
> > To:<elwynd@googlemail.com>;<dime@ietf.org>;<draft-ietf-dime-pmip6-
> lr@tools.ietf.org>
> > Cc: "Glen Zorn"<glenzorn@gmail.com>; "Russ Housley
> ""<housley@vigilsec.com>
> > Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2012 5:01 PM
> > Subject: RE: [Dime] FW: Russ Housley's Discuss on draft-ietf-dime-
> pmip6-lr-09: (with DISCUSS)
> >
> >
> > Document editors,
> >
> > Do you have any problem with fixing the editorial nits brought up by
> > Elwyn within the note to the RFC Editor?
> >
> > Thanks and Regards,
> >
> > Dan
> >
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: The Master [mailto:elwynd@googlemail.com]
> >> Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 11:34 AM
> >> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> >> Cc: Glen Zorn; Russ Housley "; dime@ietf.org;
draft-ietf-dime-pmip6-
> >> lr@tools.ietf.org
> >> Subject: Re: [Dime] FW: Russ Housley's Discuss on draft-ietf-dime-
> >> pmip6-lr-09: (with DISCUSS)
> >>
> >> Hi, Russ, Dan and authors,
> >>
> >> The latest version (v09) addresses the minor issues that I raised
on
> >> v07
> >> as discussed with Qin.  However I observe that the editorial nits
> >> *didn't* get fixed, especially the comment about 'itself' in s1
> which
> > I
> >> ought to be improved.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Elwyn
> >>
> >> On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 08:51 +0100, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
> >>> Hi Glen,
> >>>
> >>> The change control of I-Ds submitted to the IESG belongs to the
> >>> shepherding AD. I prefer to hold submissions during the week prior
> > to
> >> a
> >>> telechat so that all ADs review the same version, and editors do
> all
> >>> changes at once after the telechat. Now that you submitted, it's
> >> done,
> >>> but in case other ADs enter DISCUSSes that require changes you
will
> >> need
> >>> to issue yet another version.
> >>>
> >>> Russ, Elwyn, can you please check if you concerns were answered?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks and Regards,
> >>>
> >>> Dan
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: Glen Zorn [mailto:glenzorn@gmail.com]
> >>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 7:14 AM
> >>>> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> >>>> Cc: dime@ietf.org; "@tools.ietf.org>"; Russ Housley"
> >>>> Subject: Re: [Dime] FW: Russ Housley's Discuss on
draft-ietf-dime-
> >>>> pmip6-lr-09: (with DISCUSS)
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2/14/2012 7:16 AM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
> >>>>> Document editors,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Can you please check what is the status of these comments?
> > Please
> >> do
> >>>> not make a change now, even if all comments were accepted, but
> > wait
> >>>> until after the telechat to issue a revised version.
> >>>> Your message and Russ's DISCUSS seem to be contradictory.  In any
> >>> case,
> >>>> a revision was posted last night, long before the DISCUSS.
> >>>>
> >>>>> Thanks and Regards,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Dan
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>> From: iesg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:iesg-bounces@ietf.org] On
> >> Behalf
> >>>> Of Russ Housley
> >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 12:55 AM
> >>>>> To: The IESG
> >>>>> Cc: draft-ietf-dime-pmip6-lr@tools.ietf.org;
> >> elwynd@dial.pipex.com;
> >>>> dime-chairs@tools.ietf.org
> >>>>> Subject: Russ Housley's Discuss on draft-ietf-dime-pmip6-lr-09:
> >>> (with
> >>>> DISCUSS)
> >>>>> Russ Housley has entered the following ballot position for
> >>>>> draft-ietf-dime-pmip6-lr-09: Discuss
> >>>>>
> >>>>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply
> > to
> >>> all
> >>>>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to
> >> cut
> >>>> this
> >>>>> introductory paragraph, however.)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please refer to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-
> >>>> criteria.html
> >>>>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> -
> >>>>> DISCUSS:
> >>>>>
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> -
> >>>>>
> >>>>>    The authors have agreed to make some changes based on the
Gen-
> >> ART
> >>>>>    Review by Elwyn Davies on 2-Feb-2012.  The changes have not
> >> been
> >>>>>    posted yet.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> DiME mailing list
> >>>>> DiME@ietf.org
> >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> DiME mailing list
> >>> DiME@ietf.org
> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime