IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Din] [T2TRG] [T2TRG/Din] Discussion New draft for draft-hong-iot-edge-computing-00.txt

William_J_G Overington <wjgo_10009@btinternet.com> Tue, 10 July 2018 10:20 UTC

Return-Path: <wjgo_10009@btinternet.com>
X-Original-To: din@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: din@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BBA5130DF1; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 03:20:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.61
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.61 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=btinternet.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cX1TS7Kdw4kL; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 03:20:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rgout0702.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk (rgout0702.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk [65.20.0.142]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1A6A130F7C; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 03:20:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-OWM-Source-IP: 10.110.13.1 ()
X-OWM-Env-Sender: wjgo_10009@btinternet.com
X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification: clean
X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict: clean 20
X-VadeSecure-score: verdict=clean score=20/300, class=clean
X-SNCR-VADESECURE: CLEAN
X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict: clean 20
X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification: clean
X-RazorGate-Vade: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedtiedrgeeggddvkecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemuceutffkvffkuffjvffgnffgvefqofdpqfgfvfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucgotffhvedqqdeurggukfhmphhorhhtrghntggvucdlvddtmdenucfjughrpeffhfhrvffkjghfufggtgfgkgfrsehtjegttddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpeghihhllhhirghmpgflpgfiucfqvhgvrhhinhhgthhonhcuoeifjhhgohgpuddttddtleessghtihhnthgvrhhnvghtrdgtohhmqeenucffohhmrghinhepghhlohgsrghlnhgvthdrtghordhukhenucfkphepuddtrdduuddtrddufedruddpkeeirdduieelrddvtdekrddujedvnecurfgrrhgrmhephhgvlhhopeifvggsmhgrihhlfedurdgsthdrvgigthdrtghptghlohhuugdrtghordhukhdpihhnvghtpedutddruddutddrudefrddupdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepoeifjhhgohgpuddttddtleessghtihhnthgvrhhnvghtrdgtohhmqedprhgtphhtthhopeeoughinhesihhrthhfrdhorhhgqedprhgtphhtthhopeeojhhhohhnghesvghtrhhirdhrvgdrkhhrqedprhgtphhtthhopeeojhhoohhsrghnghdrhihouhhnsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmqedprhgtphhtthhopeeothdvthhrghesihhrthhfrdhorhhgqedprhgtphhtthhopeeofihjghhopgdutddttdelsegsthhinhhtvghrnhgvthdrtghomheqpdhrtghpthhtohepoeihghhh ohhnghesvghtrhhirdhrvgdrkhhrqeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt
Received: from webmail31.bt.ext.cpcloud.co.uk (10.110.13.1) by rgout07.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk (9.0.019.26-1) (authenticated as wjgo_10009@btinternet.com) id 5AF327ED056201C6; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 11:20:16 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=btcpcloud; t=1531218020; bh=T0GlvcMRp1AdWX3ZJMRd1SAAkwQawJdpTCM/Uw32YK8=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:MIME-Version; b=bVWB53x/PyHW2sGfyNcvugTKak0WqQj0Ev5CB4zZJxMd3EyztUg4ugNBzqq7G8lPloC9IH2F03XXgEik+xjby5tpIJL0JTAgGCDPaAU4gQ9r1ImEy4lrZVhpEGUvqDS206zTUTf2IYC10+goZv4/KPYHXyh7VB8qjoDDBVTVHK8=
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 11:20:16 +0100
From: William_J_G Overington <wjgo_10009@btinternet.com>
Reply-To: wjgo_10009@btinternet.com
To: jhong@etri.re.kr, t2trg@irtf.org, din@irtf.org
Cc: wjgo_10009@btinternet.com, yghong@etri.re.kr, joosang.youn@gmail.com
Message-ID: <2134009.15060.1531218016616.JavaMail.defaultUser@defaultHost>
In-Reply-To: <8125031.13941.1531217117229.JavaMail.root@webmail31.bt.ext.cpcloud.co.uk>
References: <8125031.13941.1531217117229.JavaMail.root@webmail31.bt.ext.cpcloud.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Importance: 3 (Normal)
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-Client-IP: IPv4[86.169.208.172] Epoch[1531218016587]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/din/XxLaCHH7K9wT2Jkvz2tq6DGiGok>
Subject: Re: [Din] [T2TRG] [T2TRG/Din] Discussion New draft for draft-hong-iot-edge-computing-00.txt
X-BeenThere: din@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of distributed Internet Infrastructure approaches, aspects such as Service Federation, and underlying technologies" <din.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/din>, <mailto:din-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/din/>
List-Post: <mailto:din@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:din-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/din>, <mailto:din-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 10:20:42 -0000

Hi

I am new to this group and this is my first post.

I have replied by using a reply all from the original post. I am not sure that this will go to din@irtf.org as I am not registered for that. 

I write to put forward two suggestions. I do not know if they will be useful to this discussion and if I sit and try to work that out it may take a very long time and even then I might not get to an answer.

So I put my two suggestions here in the hope that they will be considered please by experts so that whether the suggestions are useful or otherwise can be determined by experts.

The first suggestion is an invention of mine that I call localizable sentences. It was devised for person to person communication through the language barrier in some specific circumstances.

The system will not do everything that a human translator could do by a long way, but could be useful in some circumstances, such as, for example, seeking information about relatives and friends after a disaster, or asking a patient in a hospital if he or she would like a drink of water.

I am wondering if some localizable sentences could be useful for human to thing, thing to thing, and thing to human communication.

For example, suppose that there were the two following localizable sentences.

What is the temperature at your location please?

The temperature at my location in degrees Celsius is as follows.

Each localizable sentence is encoded as a sequence of text characters, so messages can be sent and received as plain text.

In my research the encoding is as an integral sign character followed by some circled digit characters.

The coding is explained in the following document.

http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~ngo/An_encoding_space_designed_for_application_in_encoding_localizable_sentences.pdf

The following document may also be of interest.

http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~ngo/a_completed_publication_about_localizable_sentences_research.pdf

The second suggestion is as to whether there should be defined a portable interpretable object code expressible using a sequences of text character for each command of the portable interpretable object code. The portable interpretable object code would be run on a virtual machine. Thus a thing could receive some portable interpretable object code in an ordinary text message and then run it locally on a virtual machine.

This would mean that the portable interpretable object code could be run on things that have been made by a variety of manufacturers.

William Overington

Tuesday 10 July 2018

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email