IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dispatch] Identity Adhoc - Nov 9th: Notes available

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@cisco.com> Tue, 17 November 2009 21:14 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dispatch@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dispatch@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 791823A6B0E for <dispatch@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:14:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FYOWxBVcq06t for <dispatch@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:14:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com (sj-iport-5.cisco.com [171.68.10.87]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F7B3A6B02 for <dispatch@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:14:13 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-5.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: As4EAGihAkurRN+J/2dsb2JhbACZE6V2iRsIjxOCNxQIgWgE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,760,1249257600"; d="scan'208";a="105557027"
Received: from sj-core-3.cisco.com ([171.68.223.137]) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 17 Nov 2009 21:14:12 +0000
Received: from xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-201.cisco.com [64.102.31.12]) by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nAHLEB0t008809; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:14:12 GMT
Received: from xfe-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.113]) by xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:14:11 -0500
Received: from [161.44.182.187] ([161.44.182.187]) by xfe-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:14:10 -0500
Message-ID: <4B031221.3010308@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:14:09 -0500
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com>
References: <F592E36A5C943E4E91F25880D05AD1140CC8E1F3@zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com><4B01A877.4010306@iptel.org> <4B01B9E8.7050507@neustar.biz> <048d01ca67c4$96503410$c2f0200a@cisco.com> <4B0310E1.9070200@softarmor.com>
In-Reply-To: <4B0310E1.9070200@softarmor.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Nov 2009 21:14:10.0512 (UTC) FILETIME=[E7E59D00:01CA67CA]
Cc: dispatch@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dispatch] Identity Adhoc - Nov 9th: Notes available
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dispatch>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:14:14 -0000

Dean Willis wrote:
> Dan Wing wrote:
>> Jon said:
>>> I do not find the requirement for NAT traversal unacceptable, but I 
>>> do consider the requirement for media steering highly dubious at best.
>>
>>
>> "Highly dubious" = nobody really does it?
> 
> People do highly dubious stuff all the time; they have unprotected sex, 
> they jump out of perfectly good airplanes, they vote for Obama, they try 
> for a single-handed Atlantic crossing in a 6 meter sailboat with no 
> preparation, they try to implement RAI specifications from the RFC 
> without parallel testing against existing systems, and so on.
> 
> The question is: Should we take the human urge to engage in highly 
> dubious practies like traffic steering into account when we write an 
> identity spec? If so, at what level of  dubiousness (or dubyaness, for 
> the left-leaning) do we draw the line?

I'd been thinking the dubyaness was just a bad dream.
Thank you for disabusing me of that.

	Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email