Re: [Diversity] Moving to meeting attendance NOT required

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> Thu, 16 June 2016 16:56 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: diversity@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: diversity@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 838D112D9A8 for <diversity@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 09:56:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C7WViH7UVCcW for <diversity@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 09:55:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x231.google.com (mail-pf0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC4CF12D96F for <diversity@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 09:55:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x231.google.com with SMTP id i123so17892256pfg.0 for <diversity@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 09:55:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DLdwDqATiF2WZTR6V0T9MZragPuiGWC+1oHp4ij1d7E=; b=bHCPXTl+r+0QQ47t2DtFPYs0xVmuqjRT2oqR0/QPdbq8fy4NENUW2EorpqZWrfkWS4 +i/YH8qkCwvGOgkO/pZXnJ2EmI6/9fsdjmvrTkP4vEn7chrnMKgrHx6m7TzuByZxGWLb YPstVlGQEoKtEwsaKGnDtxWRh0Q5CRFoH2PDiRcnoKEY/Afj+ZyI3tTovXcB0YyVlMUc POCDdAVVzlGwisvRGiU3JmtvNMeZe/RgT0bphbdRJLYm/5JewHethueXzeBens7NvYcV PANtYkVxW77SOe7xQjsS/7Q53FryP4PpBHqGJKS1iNfn5o6E3M8+0pZWuTcNzPaw0Yl6 CkkA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DLdwDqATiF2WZTR6V0T9MZragPuiGWC+1oHp4ij1d7E=; b=GQn5I/K7ljQ30JYCuTtq41vDS+TKL4h0BhJkPeRwSndv1MNt7D4WFySAsGL3+JytAz IvTiFVxIyd/BxqIyjk78trzcYUoXb28X++sRHd0da29mCzSuPZ5KJoOwffXTMiBoY3rA I//i7yaPIxUK3/jqlkxaiORgKHTAO2PSDRqLwAq5R6KEn3XzKLWuJHCJZ90o3wRCDsst Ejze+9vDfetde98OkFe+kw0JuXHPt1GmG0gIYyEMOtwobzplYBQi+crjF96Cc+aLpDUY tdRIJ1Z6+nqSnv+HmmgWmeJ85LEazNgk/rBHRavCsu4UigwJopXWeM2XXmW52VHArSd5 hxGg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLtGj13725A+r9k6lLsSUFt87aGHNP1fsj2c3BB77uLnqjcsRTQOYEjQS2vknHbWA==
X-Received: by 10.98.19.133 with SMTP id 5mr6374535pft.17.1466096155270; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 09:55:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Melindas-MacBook-Pro.local (216-67-71-241-radius.dynamic.acsalaska.net. [216.67.71.241]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id zo15sm41522351pab.15.2016.06.16.09.55.53 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 16 Jun 2016 09:55:54 -0700 (PDT)
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk, 'Spencer Dawkins at IETF' <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <20160608135632.20063.81792.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <C172F8BC-6339-4762-A600-5AFEEFD3ED6A@piuha.net> <0c54dab2-89cc-6d0f-c8c7-a2a65249d04d@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <6597503E-AB88-4A89-BF86-57B06E7C8FD3@consulintel.es> <0848b990-dec1-78e9-7845-1f5b683a49cd@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <4DD051C3-841E-45EE-82F0-8AF4991685A7@consulintel.es> <72313874-f19d-1a0e-0ffa-cc34e380bb8a@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <FADEFCB4-034F-49A1-999E-D3DF78DBFC89@consulintel.es> <CAAQiQRfeFn-az3n5OGLwQqscWJ_Up6V8M0WSrE4boRbbCLnvug@mail.gmail.com> <CAF4+nEFCtf4HmEZfUvzb7wH_8Ov2g0CdRzzzYsrAhhp2NhR3rg@mail.gmail.com> <128d6b02-bbf9-3afb-7353-4f411a2eb8c2@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <ad649e68-f134-bf71-8c0f-f71869a88bc8@gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20160615173304.0bd677c8@resistor.net> <d4178a9e-273c-4271-30dc-970ba463da9d@gmail.com> <3d180fde-057a-aa7! b-0483-ae8429a16e1d@dcr ocker.net> <CAKKJt-dbuDPfNdq2_BhBm3eRGUgH0T-4xdZao2pC0-85Sh+Onw@mail.gmail.com> <08f301d1c7d7$9630c650$c29252f0$@olddog.co.uk>
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <a351b31f-b420-a1d9-d6e5-6c54686fbc47@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 08:55:51 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <08f301d1c7d7$9630c650$c29252f0$@olddog.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/diversity/QhE6SNLLBG85jETDCWO92EdHO1U>
Cc: diversity@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Diversity] Moving to meeting attendance NOT required
X-BeenThere: diversity@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diversity open mailing list <diversity.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/diversity>, <mailto:diversity-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/diversity/>
List-Post: <mailto:diversity@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:diversity-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/diversity>, <mailto:diversity-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 16:56:00 -0000

On 6/16/16 6:01 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> I think Spencer caught it right (but I am also not the Mouthpiece of
> Melinda :-)

Yes, you're both correct.

> However, my reading is that this is not black and white. Nothing we do
> is "critical", "vital", or in any other way "necessary".  There are just
> shades of desirable and beneficial. There are trade-offs, and missing
> one meeting (for whatever reason - enforced, imposed, chosen,... ) is
> less likely to have an impact than never attending.

To be clear, as I've said again and again and again and again,
I think we've come to overemphasize meetings and it's a
contributing factor to slowed pace of work, narrower participant
base than we might have, and so on.  I also think this is in
large part due to some chairing decisions and one of the things
on my to-do list over the next few weeks is to get out a draft
describing things that can be done by chairs to de-emphasize
meetings in our work process.  I'll note that I've also missed
a lot of meetings, myself.

That said, my concern here is that people during discussions
about virtualizing meetings or reducing their number, we get
a lot of people saying meetings meetings meetings meetings
meetings meetings, but when a problem comes up that makes
it difficult for people with some demographic characteristics
to participate and that it might require the organization to
actually do something, suddenly it's "meetings, whatever -
you don't really need to be there."  I certainly don't think
it's intentional and I certainly don't think it's the result
of any animus, but it does reflect some of the difficulty
around this issue.

Melinda