IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Diversity] Moving to meeting attendance NOT required

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Thu, 16 June 2016 17:19 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: diversity@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: diversity@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D71AC12DA1B for <diversity@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 10:19:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.216
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.216 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=opendkim.org header.b=SnHRjp1F; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com header.b=zr4Fa2p8
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oJ9t2cauPWJf for <diversity@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 10:19:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E58F312D7D8 for <diversity@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 10:19:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.226.208.76]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u5GHJDIJ010114 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 16 Jun 2016 10:19:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1466097566; x=1466183966; bh=sxcHcpwNAM6ll2gX2OjBpwMgSyUUAvNjvUCdr4AQ7Js=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=SnHRjp1FS1gumw8mffh+qw+tMf/2Ngj7qe3Zh/A+R7IjM+mgkq5akph5K6t772DDr cY4VFKRE42dLwKD0pCI0c9zhIPunVbk6DQBsS7sy6VnDboUa4nsrBgHFw9O65R8CP2 hObCRVo2hNxGvpNL8dn5JimkjLKzN4gotf6LcNSM=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1466097566; x=1466183966; i=@elandsys.com; bh=sxcHcpwNAM6ll2gX2OjBpwMgSyUUAvNjvUCdr4AQ7Js=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=zr4Fa2p8bLloNScbOzokbmHgnNdhAoHcv0wRO0CKwqv9KsOCtJoXpbB2sfVhYoDKV C4vidEVD1hZNGC+QgUJvTwQP/WslNJxHeAWQRShpAS76n63UwHVA8yxFlOEU+dPXyi ID7aikQaQZLPFtn0hw4TJMLwba5cTfMKrpvi/LIY=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20160616075137.0b19ac90@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 09:59:03 -0700
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk, Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>, diversity@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <08f301d1c7d7$9630c650$c29252f0$@olddog.co.uk>
References: <20160608135632.20063.81792.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <c0dac7eb-3886-5bd0-4ecb-0f66008fe755@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <6d8e2bb4-e41c-5cf7-18a3-d6eac6e9a13f@gmail.com> <m28tydvh5c.wl%randy@psg.com> <C172F8BC-6339-4762-A600-5AFEEFD3ED6A@piuha.net> <0c54dab2-89cc-6d0f-c8c7-a2a65249d04d@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <6597503E-AB88-4A89-BF86-57B06E7C8FD3@consulintel.es> <0848b990-dec1-78e9-7845-1f5b683a49cd@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <4DD051C3-841E-45EE-82F0-8AF4991685A7@consulintel.es> <72313874-f19d-1a0e-0ffa-cc34e380bb8a@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <FADEFCB4-034F-49A1-999E-D3DF78DBFC89@consulintel.es> <CAAQiQRfeFn-az3n5OGLwQqscWJ_Up6V8M0WSrE4boRbbCLnvug@mail.gmail.com> <CAF4+nEFCtf4HmEZfUvzb7wH_8Ov2g0CdRzzzYsrAhhp2NhR3rg@mail.gmail.com> <128d6b02-bbf9-3afb-7353-4f411a2eb8c2@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <ad649e68-f134-bf71-8c0f-f71869a88bc8@gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20160615173304.0bd677c8@resistor.net> <d4178a9e-273c-4271-30dc-970ba463da9d@gmail.com> <3d180fde-057a-aa7! b-0483-ae8429a16e1d@dcr ocker.net> <CAKKJt-dbuDPfNdq2_BhBm3eRGUgH0T-4xdZao2pC0-85Sh+Onw@mail.gmail.com> <08f301d1c7d7$9630c650$c29252f0$@olddog.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/diversity/saR_MI4UGDb3EXcv1ju-ylXpZzw>
Subject: Re: [Diversity] Moving to meeting attendance NOT required
X-BeenThere: diversity@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diversity open mailing list <diversity.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/diversity>, <mailto:diversity-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/diversity/>
List-Post: <mailto:diversity@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:diversity-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/diversity>, <mailto:diversity-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 17:19:44 -0000

Hi Adrian, Spencer,
At 07:01 16-06-2016, Adrian Farrel wrote:
>I think SM is actually in a really good position to talk to this 
>precise point on attendance. He has been active in the IETF for a 
>long time and has achieved stuff. Yet he is not often physically at 
>IETF meetings. I'd like to hear his views, but my guess is: being 
>there is nice, interesting, and helpful, but not being there does 
>not prevent real work from being done.

The simple answer to that being there is nice, interesting, and helpful.

I have served as Working Group Secretary, Document Shepherd, Working 
Group Chair, Team Lead of a Directorate, and Document Editor.  I am 
also a RFC Author.  Some of the considerations for being there are to 
avoid internet connectivity issues, time zone difference, or if the 
person is expected to be there.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email