IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] no DMARC result for DKIM testing and policy

"John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com> Fri, 22 March 2024 18:23 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DFD7C14F70A for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 11:23:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AQGcmg_Zpfll for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 11:23:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F31EC151069 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 11:23:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 47705 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2024 18:23:00 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=ba5665fdcc84.k2403; bh=6TvRJ5xRc4aLzT3+7q8YfDpR+Jxgi4XrLQsY+nQC8UM=; b=Ext1ILXrVhvzCTEdE4ENZi669+ee+xNxhEZ0no26/lUYtI7EqYXlQorwLMIwR7nXYHukaD4uQtldeu3tynUn4wZ694DHApgA0pcG8YQfu549ac7/vr05Isp8RIMTN2bn0YrXZnZNZrD1bu9hsWK8f7042BsdomDDyVlv23qNX1C8oeO87SoNFHQO7vkyWZXluqZ2XbyNDUlez64ZM9G5hbJatuWrVu7MCm9LcCp1/t2bXXkM2F+dIx+ATrO882WlfzGvH6sWhFg5wyee+EOua5efWNCJ9pNuItgmxJowbhbHHd8LPb0aR3wpw2cYXEXD2S+/hz4itNfLVnDT321pzQ==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA CHACHA20-POLY1305 AEAD) via TCP6; 22 Mar 2024 18:23:00 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id B0AB785EE2A6; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 14:22:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ary.qy (Postfix) with ESMTP id B050285EE2A5; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 14:22:59 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 14:22:59 -0400
Message-ID: <2291fc6e-3168-282c-48d9-a80d17f13fd5@iecc.com>
From: "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
To: Benny Pedersen <me@junc.eu>, dmarc@ietf.org
X-X-Sender: johnl@ary.qy
In-Reply-To: <11aa9421dd4e295f025beb9d7c8c29dc@junc.eu>
References: <27cf610e-8666-410c-b015-6c33478af9b4@tana.it> <CAL0qLwber-s8nNDEz_TAJijh0Py-ch9G4jb9gbguEQCc17xANA@mail.gmail.com> <497E0C77-354E-445A-9758-F6BC6058B980@kitterman.com> <cdec1c75-237f-41d8-bdbb-0b4477f6cebf@tekmarc.com> <utirpc$6e0$1@gal.iecc.com> <11aa9421dd4e295f025beb9d7c8c29dc@junc.eu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/CquTEudI_gMO3ReR6e1cWecb4AM>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] no DMARC result for DKIM testing and policy
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 18:23:09 -0000

On Fri, 22 Mar 2024, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>> to confusion about DMARC and DKIM test flags.  This document is already too 
>> long and too late.
>> 
>> Unless there is an actual problem to solve here, let's close the issue and 
>> finish up.
>
> why is dkim fail here

Because the mailing list modified the message before that header was 
applied.  The IETF's mail server is a mess, and will be completely 
replaced over the next month.

> X-Spam-Status	No, score=-1.321 tagged_above=-999 required=5 
> tests=[AUTHRES_DKIM_FAIL=0.5, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.372, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, 
> DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, 
> MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-2, RCVD_IN_ANONMAILS=1.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, 
> RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=1.3, 
> SPF_PASS=-0.1] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
> Authentication-Results	mx.junc.eu (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) 
> header.d=ietf.org header.b="Xr+FwPZI"; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) 
> header.d=ietf.org header.b="Xr+FwPZI"; dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail 
> (message has been altered)" header.d=iecc.com header.b="qTXLFk6y"; dkim=fail 
> (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=taugh.com 
> header.b="IB1/7fRP"
> Authentication-Results	ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit 
> key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=iecc.com 
> header.b="qTXLFk6y"; dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been 
> altered)" header.d=taugh.com header.b="IB1/7fRP"
>
> its already dkim fail at delivery to amsl ?
>
> let me see if eitf still breaks my dkim :=)
>
>

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email