IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC result for DKIM testing and policy

Matthäus Wander <mail@wander.science> Wed, 20 March 2024 22:11 UTC

Return-Path: <mail@wander.science>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EC08C14F682 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 15:11:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=wander.science header.b="nD4PN4FR"; dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=wander.science header.b="LEbNd138"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jN2yWKquDzAW for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 15:11:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.swznet.de (cathay.swznet.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:13b:2048::113]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 946AFC14F61F for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 15:11:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wander.science; s=2023-05-rsa; h=Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Cc: Sender:Reply-To; bh=vqRzdRsO/dh7Q3N8US7ilRHHQe6DCTf9iKOB5RnHXzc=; b=nD4PN4FRo tT/kwpZozZMGPsXHwQK9sr1BkUroN7kb82rSUMQo18aQgCew67XX5676gSeBjl+RoxdlGsR9j0sBw k3r6uwXcEv+DrGcKij+hevQogETRwqYJ6+KeGxXSUNpW7BwNlLmSoiK1JjJUalUsStDmWKEAy63ni tCHw44qRAH76JsWR0xgM+nXODj8yRfAkpxDPrCWSe9zTgBBioRPJWGsPeS9S/4p+UFjLhFQ8teMQg JS3l11FWmvn45blcACkV4l0w+9Nk5Blst0pomZ+m/OK5wsnn+aSSxsAVpRUU23oTBX/IEC8ZSWzjB DiU6TGOVJKKzQQJNJFtRH3uJw==;
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wander.science; s=2023-05-ed25519; h=Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Cc: Sender:Reply-To; bh=vqRzdRsO/dh7Q3N8US7ilRHHQe6DCTf9iKOB5RnHXzc=; b=LEbNd138J yQXNRToxR7geBot+1pCtvfTKde0LRbpxX8Ah5O8d4IGvofHf+3y1cMEHhUHDqR25hMh032seOcaBg ==;
Received: from dynamic-2a01-0c23-7092-f400-64f9-5600-f9d2-9cc8.c23.pool.telefonica.de ([2a01:c23:7092:f400:64f9:5600:f9d2:9cc8]) by mail.swznet.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <mail@wander.science>) id 1rn49W-00CEIt-Sv for dmarc@ietf.org; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 23:11:20 +0100
Message-ID: <d959df28-efae-41df-a760-95adf48f5d91@wander.science>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 23:11:20 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
To: dmarc@ietf.org
References: <27cf610e-8666-410c-b015-6c33478af9b4@tana.it>
From: Matthäus Wander <mail@wander.science>
Autocrypt: addr=mail@wander.science; keydata= xjMEX32k2xYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAnfSBcaYKuP99+S+Cv7yM2MC5uDVgjDHq72XoUkvDduTN Jk1hdHRow6R1cyBXYW5kZXIgPG1haWxAd2FuZGVyLnNjaWVuY2U+wpYEExYIAD4WIQRN5cud QSNuO9g4P/vwPFqQ1RKslAUCX32k2wIbAwUJCWYBgAULCQgHAgYVCgkICwIEFgIDAQIeAQIX gAAKCRDwPFqQ1RKslBHNAP92aGE3RVTUoVtAOMVyEzC5kpipuYgwEUBGohcKJ6FlkwEAyvGn 2Cqw6T/GOCgcZb3NlOLAAh83v3GOLnbiQxzZgQ3OOARffaTbEgorBgEEAZdVAQUBAQdAMtpC ADRykYF4hU5t/d1ItWsCVcQTrUXARpFGk4s8shADAQgHwn4EGBYIACYWIQRN5cudQSNuO9g4 P/vwPFqQ1RKslAUCX32k2wIbDAUJCWYBgAAKCRDwPFqQ1RKslI9HAP908/+/2MpEH/63y93a 1WB5pcYFy9Do/b0AQjjkfP+ZVQD9EaC+bOBrNgJzHFwhJAHI0l2KD79pMSgXSllPlA0dBQg=
In-Reply-To: <27cf610e-8666-410c-b015-6c33478af9b4@tana.it>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a01:c23:7092:f400:64f9:5600:f9d2:9cc8
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mail@wander.science
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Sat, 13 Feb 2021 17:57:42 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.swznet.de)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/a-SYqtOyVucFEtIpFDURVimZRjw>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC result for DKIM testing and policy
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 22:11:28 -0000

Alessandro Vesely wrote on 2024-03-20 15:42:
> what is the result of DMARC on having, say
> 
>      dkim=pass (testing key)
> or
>      dkim=policy (512 byte key)
> 
> is that akin to SPF neutral, i.e. dmarc=fail?

dkim=pass results in dmarc=pass (if the domain is aligned). The comment 
in brackets is for human eyes and does not change the DMARC result.

dkim=policy is like spf=neutral, i.e. dmarc=fail.

Regards,
Matt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email