IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC result for DKIM testing and policy

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Thu, 21 March 2024 23:39 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5425AC15107F for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 16:39:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bz0AMLn9f_nI for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 16:39:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12d.google.com (mail-lf1-x12d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1F8EC15107C for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 16:39:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-513e588a61fso401330e87.0 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 16:39:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1711064388; x=1711669188; darn=ietf.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=OOg+Rb5ZUEBpfmtz/Y7yC4/7BfbRotboIlZE12Jin8o=; b=L8fVQX/FxqGTrqXuuZBZ3sYm3klDdecnuI0H/q5dBnlZdc/87b4zYRCwRFd3N0sQh7 GlUGI7YrA9uSMKTB4WqlGvYJZSgq3ZjQ7xlBTl61YdH3N74x4V2jxKPAfiKrPbDsJXZa pUnJ/mXI8OvxprCLVTVv5Ys9QBBofUtn1sdCcbDlFZtxMeCqJ7QHBqn/jLDY8sm82oNt cQ4rGM5R7r0s1oeDz9SqwZ9mIl5+I7K7cEy557gbr6t3W7jlsn0Wzvip8gPXILp2vaHe Xtg8ymlWLDokToNSFiuGxMMNl9q/3mlFetgAFsca0eTS3bRugt+mGb81D6qDSKWIu5n5 z8hA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1711064388; x=1711669188; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=OOg+Rb5ZUEBpfmtz/Y7yC4/7BfbRotboIlZE12Jin8o=; b=TX9RP7yxym140kpH9dlDzl73I8f7VEIXUWhjmAnFAeH3mrYEqgx92RunEFz0jbGZqL yJI0KV8rAJPm919H/rDSSiC5iqiXYQFCtz6TeOIDoalo+yHk9feCbQwfe8kv53kkRlN7 I7mVHbPT+ebL/0UaIsUFk/br3Bs5G86lsKaNvnp2DiQn40MYsXvmM9A/MYK8AOiN0DnJ B17x3JaNvQS7juSWExGM8LwFMjg0aqVKeLiCrHYpUxQaXAhov+VMUGPcJ3fdEUT42lpR H7BrgWilnLGmlU4zk+G6VomZkxFprHflbHt0qQjXf+Gmr1GZci+7U9u6THJeb4kEx7Qd +FKQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwnqnK9hrvO0AyqIG2sgI0L2yIWDfaPBLBfQMtdOpz0f22IY9Ua /57Ew/9p8rX1AigdVT0ZTjuMtbJvsg6k5QN2pojPq25sFsEyq5uYNK2B2MH7lSq5xCLtlpH6XgO ZJvWLiojTfj2N5xneLKGDGht4fyPqK8C5hSc59w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGGb/kWbrai8eHAms2FcjoEirlNzOA7buLzBQAr5Ihifa3zHRdrPMedSB6RcbBgDVstVL12rNdSE0AvDukDKVw=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:9104:0:b0:513:c1a8:28c1 with SMTP id t4-20020a199104000000b00513c1a828c1mr183406lfd.2.1711064388130; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 16:39:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <27cf610e-8666-410c-b015-6c33478af9b4@tana.it> <d959df28-efae-41df-a760-95adf48f5d91@wander.science> <8acac3b8-4529-4c21-b7a4-462564199db4@tana.it> <CAHej_8m6MFQ9m5U+=iHeL9MiXno3LF80=rsbKv0c99_24yo2Qw@mail.gmail.com> <8376D937-E7A9-4C0D-86F9-DB4FD2C117E6@kitterman.com>
In-Reply-To: <8376D937-E7A9-4C0D-86F9-DB4FD2C117E6@kitterman.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 09:39:35 +1000
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwber-s8nNDEz_TAJijh0Py-ch9G4jb9gbguEQCc17xANA@mail.gmail.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000ae23b0614343914"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/UnTsVtUlvPNmMxHxAxWk6tw3N3Q>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC result for DKIM testing and policy
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 23:39:51 -0000

On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 12:59 AM Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
wrote:

> >> For t=y, DKIM says:
> >>
> >>        y  This domain is testing DKIM.  Verifiers MUST NOT treat
> messages
> >>           from Signers in testing mode differently from unsigned email,
> >>           even should the signature fail to verify.  Verifiers MAY wish
> >>           to track testing mode results to assist the Signer.
> >>
> >> So reporting dkim=pass for testing keys seems to be a violation.
>

DMARC being told "pass" by a DKIM engine for a testing key is a problem in
the DKIM engine.

-MSK, p11g

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email