Re: [dmarc-ietf] no DMARC result for DKIM testing and policy

[Benny Pedersen <[e-mail]>]

John R. Levine skrev den 2024-03-22 19:22:
> On Fri, 22 Mar 2024, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>>> to confusion about DMARC and DKIM test flags.  This document is 
>>> already too long and too late.
>>> 
>>> Unless there is an actual problem to solve here, let's close the 
>>> issue and finish up.
>> 
>> why is dkim fail here
> 
> Because the mailing list modified the message before that header was 
> applied.  The IETF's mail server is a mess, and will be completely 
> replaced over the next month.

X-Spam-Status	No, score=0.679 tagged_above=-999 required=5 
tests=[AUTHRES_DKIM_PASS=-0.5, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.372, 
DKIM_ADSP_DISCARD=1.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, 
DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, KAM_MXURI=1.2, 
MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-2, RCVD_IN_ANONMAILS=1.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, 
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=1.3, 
SPF_PASS=-0.1] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results	mx.junc.eu (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit 
key) header.d=ietf.org header.b="LudFgiUU"; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) 
header.d=ietf.org header.b="Adq3Jxj4"; dkim=fail (2048-bit key) 
reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=junc.eu 
header.b="e0KF8MmP"
Authentication-Results	ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit 
key) header.d=junc.eu

what i get back on faulty maillist, note no problem

will the faulty server add openARC or dito in rspamd ?, it must be done 
before maillist manager see the mail, not after