IETF Logo Mail Archive

[dmarc-ietf] DMARC result for DKIM testing and policy

Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> Wed, 20 March 2024 14:43 UTC

Return-Path: <vesely@tana.it>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CF4CC14F749 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 07:43:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.407
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.407 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1152-bit key) header.d=tana.it
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZePH1iN30by2 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 07:43:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wmail.tana.it (wmail.tana.it [94.198.96.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1507AC14F748 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 07:42:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=delta; t=1710945771; bh=sVtGtXxUsIQjauyFMqbn1V+nW/li1AA2gxsGXeJWgzk=; h=Date:From:To:Subject; b=C+WmxOrnjtoJi3xJubLvAE2NL7ddYpcxYFDrB8l70lNi/MLpaL5n34PBRQm485UJe hsG6QpVbygePMJ5DlkSUZDgEM0/WA09ANp7JRoHZUHZK3YknVN3Phw7L7WCAcNqwZB zsJYA5Dv2bR8/s6I379zsQSGxfOKzeO6/nZ8VQNZLiOCEpDGA7L4h+H/aEoHv
Original-Subject: DMARC result for DKIM testing and policy
Author: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Received: from [172.25.197.120] (pcale.tana [172.25.197.120]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 uXDGrn@SYT0/k, TLS: TLS1.3, 128bits, ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) by wmail.tana.it with ESMTPSA id 00000000005DC076.0000000065FAF5EA.000019CA; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 15:42:50 +0100
Message-ID: <27cf610e-8666-410c-b015-6c33478af9b4@tana.it>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 15:42:50 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US, it-IT
Authentication-Results: tana.it; auth=pass (details omitted)
From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
To: dmarc-ietf <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/aa83Q1UvvHamxXubgGvXcXgLAK8>
Subject: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC result for DKIM testing and policy
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 14:43:06 -0000

Hi,

what is the result of DMARC on having, say

     dkim=pass (testing key)
or
     dkim=policy (512 byte key)

is that akin to SPF neutral, i.e. dmarc=fail?


Best
Ale
--

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email