IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #39 - remove p=quarantine

Dotzero <dotzero@gmail.com> Wed, 02 December 2020 13:18 UTC

Return-Path: <dotzero@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E01253A13CF for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 05:18:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b1-A6oVxgUnb for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 05:18:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk1-x736.google.com (mail-qk1-x736.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::736]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C19113A13CE for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 05:18:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk1-x736.google.com with SMTP id y18so1060310qki.11 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 05:18:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=jTGw74IbFRY7oMj46cDbN+kBaQN7XT8WaapzhXRPGDc=; b=kYvX+1oHmCbIvhct4TGjPaQhn4PVt9AFqa54185yWdHB1fHm4r8mxgTpdGlGZIP2s9 lqMa2KI7hrNcw1DCoQoERG9d5Kefr7JQrPHiJSGho+JtiTUZdx5hpRVdxfrf6GIUIJoz uOyGUx2Hw1XBELWsZQ81+SRPMsdZ9uKfU/0sJrOGyO71a9P81is+XU37S3AsMNfEToKt AFcemeOj36kb9bChnkZ9ebELx7hth3qcASZ7sRifhi42RJSbMoxRQVSpf64mgWXk7zi7 YsdYYPr9a4sVNwmufGCnsplis6fByxeYvAhYDErnSfNijA+8HwEVCV1P3Dnw5fQs6+gA FeNA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=jTGw74IbFRY7oMj46cDbN+kBaQN7XT8WaapzhXRPGDc=; b=KjZQKBa1Y+UOfzda7Wl6SymKpTqPX+XGLK3LSFjbPosntfAYvsg8Y5K+FtLz/6dQ5Q NSquI7MIN7qlt1Z+Ziz2ccHiINhkwCjs4vfop4OaYzyKaPFYBuT1heBpirghneISlFQH p8e8x5/fT4tgz4VmiI7fsF7lMX1PEVpwwTXkSOin/H007twCzmIUPLyoqH7/Et72Vbxc 1rcU18nKE4IHfo5XbXo9ls6mg+ekjNIrAtINHwOW2aHscsys+clzl/VnowxYjswaTOS9 TLAVzu4NSzRF99qJOQ2Y6/PD1D0h+CEHA89Buzf6y5X/y7ZzQ0dxVKELqnK3NzvG/lB0 4zJw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531ACwTv6HIEVAxYC90QlBk+yk02baGhGtKPa2iVlgbQZQ6hvGls /yDXXZCCx8PMyjxSFVDBJBDKUAGr6/1Tui6PP0xuQlLS
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw4TJuf/xqSE6ACpCwATUPFVvAo+DPZE3xa459cXcAgMBKe6Zi2UU3ov34hQpZFZX4kFn1X/NHzDV9ONlnN6pY=
X-Received: by 2002:a37:6805:: with SMTP id d5mr2419609qkc.66.1606915090391; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 05:18:10 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <a49a7a79-6c52-ded7-60a3-754cd12fb7c3@taugh.com> <2fc01257-3307-c453-18a0-bc423dccfe6a@gmail.com> <CAH48Zfx448mxL9Btmqp0xUCK88yN9=h6Qus-4u4J2_W14aXwUw@mail.gmail.com> <e4ce658f-3a19-aa24-0fb2-2078d06fcc34@crash.com> <CAJ4XoYc449sNvfkGbibc8xzfUvxkZkSNFzjnzxg2SjbftA8FYg@mail.gmail.com> <065f9a15-d0fb-4564-376b-0c7036079488@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <065f9a15-d0fb-4564-376b-0c7036079488@gmail.com>
From: Dotzero <dotzero@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 08:17:58 -0500
Message-ID: <CAJ4XoYd41-bLzswhrObr+vaSvZxcoobPttqxXMdztAJ5JniL0g@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000025a65105b57b1363"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/EN_5AEnQaOTD7yixD1nnoKNotsk>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #39 - remove p=quarantine
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 13:18:13 -0000

You are absolutely correct. It also doesn't prevent direct domain abuse
when someone uses snail mail.

Michael Hammer

On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 10:09 PM Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 12/1/2020 7:01 PM, Dotzero wrote:
> > DMARC does one thing and one thing only - It mitigates direct domain
> > abuse.
>
> It mitigates direct domain abuse in the rfc5322.From field.
>
> It doesn't mitigate domain abuse anywhere else.
>
> d/
>
> --
> Dave Crocker
> dcrocker@gmail.com
> 408.329.0791
>
> Volunteer, Silicon Valley Chapter
> American Red Cross
> dave.crocker2@redcross.org
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email