Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #1 - SPF alignment

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Wed, 10 February 2021 01:28 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9A8C3A1142 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 17:28:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.85
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.85 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=MIlHfNM6; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=M7iDpPRD
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OSKIqvY9bAsn for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 17:28:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B99363A1141 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 17:28:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 4198 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2021 01:28:05 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=1063.602336a5.k2102; bh=G2McoNJNBXzGxtUxhAHDnK/VT3u3awRkVA+AYU+4LC0=; b=MIlHfNM6KmTURcYNJ25GjJ7KidhvQnKpDyzNzuwHJqrha4nQizQTXEDi+XZ7hOY/ZF9I2L6vrpc3pXjcYjxDQkmy3hmVlnJhrInyvGA1VMlQRvcYHQAItCl+acP6YCE/Y1Wd95d1/oF1UPxO7dueEPF66mqquNjoXFLN7t5CuJ7lEXD/i+rPhBfMFyNtlHEAU4foUAj7YDhyUoD6ZpQf+M8Xh6HLThYeR4PtEB9FsdwwjOHg9A7vxNA5zWVkwNZkqG5xvqU2ZnuzmvN5vHN8E/xndjOck8Ny1qQUnmI1ln9kBAyAkNewueHd20gN7IWF1iYknRNN4qOzwoCiNq4WtQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=1063.602336a5.k2102; bh=G2McoNJNBXzGxtUxhAHDnK/VT3u3awRkVA+AYU+4LC0=; b=M7iDpPRDkh/1zHqLHZ7ET3GjR1duZQQea4MUMrNPFdXh24k/KXiaWR2KyeT8yVEDpshSfOu7J4XHYlJgzUMdfoi92hAnPbjFkwYUGLizGJHSy/cPthT/pWm7/Y+iSmWnXrmhEqP4jRprm2/m9URPqDDQ00bdflQ9lKzCZZXSlqz3FLnaK+h69A1eMtGBD/9070DPK2a6gJtERlH6SmfdBw57PuuJ6X3jmOzH+nuhPFhI4deOoAxPEAqq7Zj2c1yx3QrmJb91KrCvRAxh2sth6xhxX3FITjVOwTspF0tj2UhsFBcpn/OvD4trvV3kpLtTlNYuajynpGa7O35E9FrQcA==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 10 Feb 2021 01:28:05 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id B47F96DAC4C6; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 20:28:04 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2021 20:28:04 -0500
Message-Id: <20210210012804.B47F96DAC4C6@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Cc: todd.herr@valimail.com
In-Reply-To: <CAHej_8k6DA8140QB2buaRCaJfc0U9fVSC=nSAu-dWsZshCRX_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/xoPtktORM7KLmYfRIkhs_BH_OTg>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #1 - SPF alignment
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 01:28:09 -0000

In article <CAHej_8k6DA8140QB2buaRCaJfc0U9fVSC=nSAu-dWsZshCRX_Q@mail.gmail.com> you write:
>
>The likelihood of a HELO identifier both passing an SPF check and aligning
>with the RFC5322.From identifier is, I would venture, so small as to be
>immeasurable for shared services such as ESPs, mailing list servers, and
>the like. ...

Agreed.  You can do it on your hobby linux box but not at any sort of scale.

Once again, there is nothing to fix here.  Can we close this now?

R's,
John