IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] Multiple DNS requests per packet, multiple packet responses

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Wed, 19 March 2014 18:36 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF5B21A071A for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 11:36:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.547
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.547 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gsluzjKJKIzq for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 11:36:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D82CC1A06FD for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 11:36:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B483800AF; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 14:36:48 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1395254208; bh=DVn5c6oQL22itpDmNq8UyetkWr3UsyOxA9X0CxpAA7Y=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=sorJuqOcbZR7jKpkqckoBPxJLqmQXRZGf6Pey+XLusgIcY/D92yCHalmKdFwfmihM iPgmBfPs7pAjCLOMasPPRQU5UY4gWZhgpv0nECgmP2QNsAq2xUH+YGMyhWbO4fwjo2 2eKa8FrT6PKtjAel/MfyhVb74xM2pIAqqx03HLFM=
Received: from localhost (paul@localhost) by bofh.nohats.ca (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id s2JIalT2025093; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 14:36:47 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: bofh.nohats.ca: paul owned process doing -bs
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 14:36:47 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwgXExHH6YxpvQLEsgZ+C4uUjvv0E=+g0XBmWVBrQnG_-w@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.10.1403191435350.2170@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <CAMm+LwgXExHH6YxpvQLEsgZ+C4uUjvv0E=+g0XBmWVBrQnG_-w@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.10 (LFD 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/K4VqTHhYLHmeTaLp_GMw40btMws
Cc: dns-privacy@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] Multiple DNS requests per packet, multiple packet responses
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 18:36:59 -0000

On Wed, 19 Mar 2014, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:

> One consequence of encrypting DNS traffic is that we break backwards compatibility.

Various proposals that are floating around do no such thing. I have been
critical of djb putting dnscurve over port 53 and I would be just as
critical to others suggesting we put non-DNS over port 53.

Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email