IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] next steps for draft-opportunistic-adotq

Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> Tue, 23 March 2021 21:22 UTC

Return-Path: <jim@rfc1035.com>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2C453A16E6 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 14:22:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.498
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.498 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GTYhDy0-2iD9 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 14:22:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shaun.rfc1035.com (smtp.v6.rfc1035.com [IPv6:2001:4b10:100:7::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89BA93A16D6 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 14:22:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gromit.rfc1035.com (gromit.rfc1035.com [195.54.233.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shaun.rfc1035.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 56EA82420C28; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 21:22:16 +0000 (UTC)
From: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
Message-Id: <6557D045-3A78-47EB-B113-220DAD92A973@rfc1035.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E70E780B-AF7D-4F0F-93F1-5AB8F1B61047"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.7\))
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 21:22:15 +0000
In-Reply-To: <CAHbrMsCRdF6+RKq857tZFO_eTPtiCcQ3LMqhG6LG1=GEkmbk7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: DNS Privacy Working Group <dns-privacy@ietf.org>
To: Ben Schwartz <bemasc=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <2ba5ac12c24eaee4c51de2cd2c1693e9bd1fd8b2.camel@powerdns.com> <4bc96140-454e-0746-83b3-bb1331cf7cce@cs.tcd.ie> <ADB00FD5-A6EA-4D05-84E8-A44A2E40BE7C@icann.org> <8363070a-8fc5-2d20-a9aa-45673d1515ac@innovationslab.net> <5861CBBC-4C76-4455-90FF-B127171CF054@rfc1035.com> <1bed6998-49fe-3620-e3a2-b51942c795cc@nohats.ca> <C09A688F-A8BD-4AD0-B02A-7A476D26AFE8@rfc1035.com> <CAHbrMsCRdF6+RKq857tZFO_eTPtiCcQ3LMqhG6LG1=GEkmbk7Q@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/VALXLsIKkutiUio0FenWnVGbLak>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] next steps for draft-opportunistic-adotq
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 21:22:24 -0000


> On 23 Mar 2021, at 21:20, Ben Schwartz <bemasc=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> I think there's a miscommunication here.  The proposals here are about how a TLD operator can tell a **recursive resolver** what encrypted DNS server to use, exactly like an NS record.  This is not suggesting any change to stub resolver behavior.

Ben, I was referring to recursive resolver behaviour, not stubs.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email