IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] next steps for draft-opportunistic-adotq

Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net> Wed, 24 March 2021 13:34 UTC

Return-Path: <woody@pch.net>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF30B3A0AB9 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 06:34:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KiOG_IvXL8lS for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 06:34:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.pch.net (keriomail.pch.net [206.220.231.84]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D27153A0A31 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 06:34:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Footer: cGNoLm5ldA==
Received: from [10.19.48.7] ([69.166.14.2]) by mail.pch.net (Kerio Connect 9.2.7 patch 3) with ESMTPS (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256 bits)) for dns-privacy@ietf.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 06:34:33 -0700
From: Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E6874B60-9498-4035-97E3-B573735A99FB"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\))
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 14:34:28 +0100
References: <A68841F4-B7CC-4AAC-BC9F-0961ADF2C8FA@rfc1035.com> <DF40D081-1EA8-4E92-BB67-2966E32688DE@nohats.ca>
To: dns-privacy@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <DF40D081-1EA8-4E92-BB67-2966E32688DE@nohats.ca>
Message-Id: <2E5B5290-CBBE-4F20-AD89-0BDCE3B2AA7F@pch.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/goKNF1KNrYD-Vg85nyaNAv9Qb1g>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] next steps for draft-opportunistic-adotq
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 13:34:40 -0000

On Mar 23, 2021, at 18:48, Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> wrote:
> TLDs should not be publishing SVCB records for the reasons I outlined before.


I’m still looking for those reasons.  Could you enumerate them again?

> I very much doubt any busy TLD will ever turn on DoT or DoH on their authoritative name servers.

I’ve got a few hundred that say otherwise.

                                -Bill

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email