IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] next steps for draft-opportunistic-adotq

Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net> Wed, 24 March 2021 14:10 UTC

Return-Path: <woody@pch.net>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FB8A3A2D22 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 07:10:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Rl_t6DpQsJwi for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 07:10:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.pch.net (keriomail.pch.net [206.220.231.84]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A2263A2D1A for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 07:10:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Footer: cGNoLm5ldA==
Received: from [10.19.48.7] ([69.166.14.2]) by mail.pch.net (Kerio Connect 9.2.7 patch 3) with ESMTPS (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256 bits)) for dns-privacy@ietf.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 07:10:44 -0700
From: Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_74D80C8C-6762-4C6C-9FCC-3C7537A84EE7"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\))
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 15:10:41 +0100
References: <A68841F4-B7CC-4AAC-BC9F-0961ADF2C8FA@rfc1035.com> <DF40D081-1EA8-4E92-BB67-2966E32688DE@nohats.ca> <2E5B5290-CBBE-4F20-AD89-0BDCE3B2AA7F@pch.net> <DB196A4D-2720-4C9E-8A66-C314AB16BA0E@rfc1035.com>
To: dns-privacy@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <DB196A4D-2720-4C9E-8A66-C314AB16BA0E@rfc1035.com>
Message-Id: <A45C3DAA-C910-427A-9359-E38570D274D3@pch.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/y_69JswVLQ6pxXnjYikyaECd9D8>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] next steps for draft-opportunistic-adotq
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 14:10:52 -0000


> On Mar 24, 2021, at 2:54 PM, Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> wrote:
>>> I very much doubt any busy TLD will ever turn on DoT or DoH on their authoritative name servers.
>> 
>> I’ve got a few hundred that say otherwise.
> 
> That’s fine Bill. However I think we’re using different definitions of busy.

How many mqps are necessary to have a voice in your vision of multistakeholderism?

Or, viewed from the other end of the spectrum, are you suggesting that only the two or three largest TLDs out of two thousand, count?

                                -Bill

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email