IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] next steps for draft-opportunistic-adotq

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> Tue, 23 March 2021 21:30 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB2CF3A170E for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 14:30:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BxvR3csIcGWx for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 14:30:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppa3.lax.icann.org (ppa3.lax.icann.org [192.0.33.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 936A03A1106 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 14:30:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MBX112-E2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (out.mail.icann.org [64.78.33.7]) by ppa3.lax.icann.org (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with ESMTPS id 12NLTwXW019034 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 23 Mar 2021 21:29:58 GMT
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.128) by MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.128) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.721.2; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 14:29:57 -0700
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org ([10.226.41.128]) by MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org ([10.226.41.128]) with mapi id 15.02.0721.013; Tue, 23 Mar 2021 14:29:57 -0700
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
To: Ben Schwartz <bemasc@google.com>
CC: "dns-privacy@ietf.org" <dns-privacy@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [dns-privacy] [Ext] next steps for draft-opportunistic-adotq
Thread-Index: AQHXH+8YBh9mhkOulUeGou0cj8RqXaqSH5kAgABpZ4CAAAPRAA==
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 21:29:57 +0000
Message-ID: <DDDD0BFE-3CAC-4ED9-ADFF-A319D192CA8A@icann.org>
References: <2ba5ac12c24eaee4c51de2cd2c1693e9bd1fd8b2.camel@powerdns.com> <4bc96140-454e-0746-83b3-bb1331cf7cce@cs.tcd.ie> <ADB00FD5-A6EA-4D05-84E8-A44A2E40BE7C@icann.org> <8363070a-8fc5-2d20-a9aa-45673d1515ac@innovationslab.net> <E37E7434-A557-40F2-A9FA-B647B35D1638@icann.org> <CAHbrMsAsd5J1p6oZxhuTRbpQn+DsUbMT2tzuTK72pSPMnMuwHw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHbrMsAsd5J1p6oZxhuTRbpQn+DsUbMT2tzuTK72pSPMnMuwHw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.0.32.234]
x-source-routing-agent: Processed
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_87F58775-8199-4061-AC5A-B710669EBE70"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.369, 18.0.761 definitions=2021-03-23_11:2021-03-23, 2021-03-23 signatures=0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/cQ0ym1YWJ1v-nZGIDu3ms4UP8kw>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] next steps for draft-opportunistic-adotq
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 21:30:05 -0000

On Mar 23, 2021, at 2:16 PM, Ben Schwartz <bemasc@google.com> wrote:
> In my view, if ...

Proposal: we don't pretend to be contract lawyers here. 

If the WG makes a technical change that would affect contracts (not just ICANN contracts), the contracted parties can then discuss those among themselves.

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email