IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] next steps for draft-opportunistic-adotq

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Sat, 27 March 2021 02:24 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEC473A1A90 for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 19:24:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F2LYr3Lyx4OF for <dns-privacy@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 19:24:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x12b.google.com (mail-il1-x12b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A5743A1A91 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 19:24:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x12b.google.com with SMTP id r17so466416ilt.0 for <dns-privacy@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 19:24:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=JdmpmY10xu04WHcf4w4NkyDOMnxRU1URVdP4/QXkCus=; b=Rhovgdzl+aMw2lKyTz540pxT4uVm0Vss7jRC/XM4jg1M2Zwgfm6AZDz/T8v2It7fg7 7GnDr5aM6jv5Sc6TrZIPLBeU2Yp5S3tTf5Jy9c+gIHDoi9BFiXfgPjt+908jJ/YSaiRV T+oupOv7iHwzln8Aid+lBrESU8mtFbo7mn4s7C6YQ47ELqmSQ3bP9DQa5ea2qzA/8dY7 3zrtdC7RVUK05EN5m4kQY18rVNXC0a+QJbAwyhqzQUEF8y4eBShzUAIE3koZJX+l0IAM JRrIjYDvxpnqyoPpMhsMsbxOh4KQznXSOEaBVk/907FI0QjDIR1uNiSgV7cXIwD6HcHY 2TbQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=JdmpmY10xu04WHcf4w4NkyDOMnxRU1URVdP4/QXkCus=; b=kHXSPiN9xhW5gEkkJeZ9i0I72tyTo6SCoPQalkufhYmmW7D06M/QBDkKMdzJTJz1p8 HR0YTlU0E5C0bXzxtFAFl3hw7lIDt9vwmZws2inOMryTuHUrgDDmvVbj+G/Z+YOihKCe YuXAFdZ0+UlKSCRgzZEEuGmTyMq2aXHuIucqc+CbYndTNAjRd6uu1y+kmLwKfN5Lbaqv wLGwBVFR62uQTam4WOV1d1M6Lg1VDM3KIs7y/effZukV9eQ2hdPvppUh8gyMzEi0fyG+ 5G8Nzke6bb+lxJjJ8ZYqys3/qDO/FT0glQyVZJMOPwLDSJ/oMeIFg9qeEvWpr1dxcvxi 5ZbA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530D9oGIiabY+oPKgRoPFYDIng8FPdRQSxByz3xwFfj2u8Ft/f9P ulIqq5edsEg+IYBa4QYoWX7BuF6W9mq33PiL7vI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw+6YW/1oUKzy6BtOX6KzhF7Tp+SLHiUdZGK2JYnLr4UOOU3uIYuka94BzmZAkv+C7nyh6pCc7tv4MRXN6c8Q4=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:b09:: with SMTP id b9mr12868118ilf.257.1616811873055; Fri, 26 Mar 2021 19:24:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <A68841F4-B7CC-4AAC-BC9F-0961ADF2C8FA@rfc1035.com> <DF40D081-1EA8-4E92-BB67-2966E32688DE@nohats.ca> <2E5B5290-CBBE-4F20-AD89-0BDCE3B2AA7F@pch.net> <DB196A4D-2720-4C9E-8A66-C314AB16BA0E@rfc1035.com> <A45C3DAA-C910-427A-9359-E38570D274D3@pch.net> <C6C1D17A-CE7B-4189-BC63-69FD2C5E9FD8@rfc1035.com> <CABcZeBMHXHY28y3KD=b7+KVkKhZ=A=du-2fJiG2=5oEYgm1ZRQ@mail.gmail.com> <80e40639-56ae-49a9-8207-83d7080593f0@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <80e40639-56ae-49a9-8207-83d7080593f0@cs.tcd.ie>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 19:24:22 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6SyaQ0dMF34c6ko8Vd5Gkfo_992ywVTcHDk1sCw2DzpQoQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Cc: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>, DNS Privacy Working Group <dns-privacy@ietf.org>, Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005cb6c505be7b59a3"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/lwgUTUag0RY6sCbxw8QFMlWBApE>
Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] next steps for draft-opportunistic-adotq
X-BeenThere: dns-privacy@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dns-privacy.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dns-privacy/>
List-Post: <mailto:dns-privacy@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>, <mailto:dns-privacy-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2021 02:24:39 -0000

On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 7:02 PM Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
wrote:

>
> Hiya,
>
> Not asking anyone in particular but...
>
> On 27/03/2021 00:24, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> > WRT the operational risk (slide 3), it's likely true that it's
> > somewhat harder to run a DoX server than a Do53 server. However,
> > given that we have plenty of worked examples of TLS servers of
> > comparable if not greater scale being operated with high reliability
> > (e.g., Google, Fastly, Cloudflare, etc.), I think there's pretty
> > strong evidence that this is an operational issue that can be
> > addressed.
>
> That's been said a number of times, and I think has a
> fairly clear ring of truth to it, but yet it somehow doesn't
> seem to sway those who operate larger scale Do53 services
> today.
>
> Can anyone help me understand that?
>

I can't help, but I don't understand it either.

If someone were to come back with data on cost or stability, that might be
helpful.

thanks,
Rob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email