Re: [dns-privacy] [DNSOP] [Doh] New: draft-bertola-bcp-doh-clients

[Christian Huitema <[e-mail]>]

On 3/13/2019 9:56 AM, Livingood, Jason wrote:
> On 3/12/19, 11:40 PM, "Doh on behalf of Christian Huitema" <[e-mail] on behalf of [e-mail]> wrote:
>
>> Why do you think you can filter content? Who made you king?
> [JL] End users may have opted into / subscribed to such a parental control system. An enterprise may say we'll only connect to the Internet and allow traffic of X or Y type in/out for security reasons. And a primary school may be legally required to filter out adult content in exchange for a government grant to fund their network/computers/connectivity. There are many more examples that can be considered.


Take the example of end users who may have opted in a parental control
system. Some may have, and some may not have. If we want a productive
conversation, we need to start from scenarios like that. If an end user
has opted in a specific parental control system, then applications
performing their own name resolution should follow the end user
preference, and it would be nice to have a management interface exposing
that. But then, if the user has not opted in such system, it would be
nice if the ISP refrained from interfering with name resolution for that
user. How do we achieve those two goals in practice?

-- Christian Huitema