Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for: draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Mon, 25 June 2018 21:08 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06CA8130E5E for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 14:08:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.751
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.751 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=bTSf/jy+; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=T2ypFsOZ
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q2X2xbcBh78v for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 14:08:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0C64130E5A for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 14:08:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 66498 invoked from network); 25 Jun 2018 21:08:08 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=103c0.5b3159b8.k1806; bh=YLE/hEYosh+Q6Fmmts5wTK7w6cvU2Es+JgAwj7IwRzs=; b=bTSf/jy+O+Fm1HsQibd19PidxZWkV3Ljyw9xNUs/Ax40H52F7Jdb3CEj0K7HgV98b3v9Ic3mii2JRtunBpQ8DJUId7AFpShy58l9tKIGe6JGDdcnzP8/chrctTsQiYveOvb1kbW4UGvaaCzY3CTnpDwefNOpfDO5Q8sbKSvdFhSCEnrKTEeiH+9AF0B2hV+ED+q7r5ziOX6vFIc7PG2HAxlTxV3FqpNXjF4WFdqV+khBLw+T1KWJ57tcDF8gqojN
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=103c0.5b3159b8.k1806; bh=YLE/hEYosh+Q6Fmmts5wTK7w6cvU2Es+JgAwj7IwRzs=; b=T2ypFsOZvvGxqm4nf0rbTrsE8R/r+3tGa496f8syEOlW+n4LENtj3D1gEk/BAacBMrdr2SnUITLp4knPaMzNYXeLde9IfaopiSVybXlIvabgqWcFDaOJ/8Ye81EjxrGqWkad2aoHffriAEci7TcuEwFbCdCjkW4uZXp4DVrT2QgvUEhcq57rcDOqw1xSxsiDOq09jM6IAZRIsr7OrqEeUcj2TO4MjrxUq1H3LIQGbFBEfbtEZYyEkOvD9cWlJTXI
Received: from ary.local ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTP via TCP6; 25 Jun 2018 21:08:08 -0000
Received: by ary.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 7791A2888379; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 16:08:06 -0500 (EST)
Date: 25 Jun 2018 16:08:06 -0500
Message-Id: <20180625210807.7791A2888379@ary.local>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Cc: benno@NLnetLabs.nl
In-Reply-To: <60eb1c1a-5a3a-5908-27c1-7b3cf587eb14@NLnetLabs.nl>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/55Sl8JdwKBiwikgT9khlMrNOWZk>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for: draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 21:08:11 -0000

In article <60eb1c1a-5a3a-5908-27c1-7b3cf587eb14@NLnetLabs.nl> you write:
>This starts a Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf

I think it's ready to go but I also think it would better be handled
as a bundle with attrleaf-fix because if we find something in one
it's likely to affect the other.

One minor point in attrleaf, is whether to mention the poor
interactions between _names and wildcards.  One issue is that
_blah.*.example doesn't work, the other is that *.example will match
underscored names which can be surprising if it has RRs of a type that
might be underscored, notably TXT.

R's,
John
-- 
Regards,
John Levine, johnl@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly