[DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTTP in dnsop?

[Shane Kerr <[e-mail]>]

Hello,

I have updated the DNS over HTTP review document that I sent some days
ago. Thanks to Jinmei for reading it.

As I mentioned before, if there is interest then my co-authors and I
are happy to try to get the working group to adopt the document. If
there is not interest, then we are happy to go forward with an
individual submission.

If I don't hear any positive support over the next week or two then
that is a pretty clear sign that the working group has little
interest. :)

Cheers,

--
Shane

--- Begin Message ---

A new version of I-D, draft-shane-review-dns-over-http-01.txt
has been successfully submitted by Shane Kerr and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:		draft-shane-review-dns-over-http
Revision:	01
Title:		A review of implementation DNS over port 80/443
Document date:	2015-12-16
Group:		Individual Submission
Pages:		7
URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-shane-review-dns-over-http-01.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-shane-review-dns-over-http/
Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-shane-review-dns-over-http-01
Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-shane-review-dns-over-http-01

Abstract:
   The default DNS transport uses UDP on port 53.  There are many
   motivations why users or operators may prefer to avoid sending DNS
   traffic in this way.  A common solution is to use port 80 or 443;
   with plain TCP, TLS-encrypted TCP, or full HTTP(S).  This memo
   reviews the possible approaches and delivers some useful information
   for developers.

                                                                                  


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat

--- End Message ---