IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] nsec3-parameters opinions gathered

Miek Gieben <miek@miek.nl> Fri, 05 November 2021 08:05 UTC

Return-Path: <miek@miek.nl>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15C933A0A70 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 01:05:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.888
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.888 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=miek-nl.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G6Xw1vi5FtjN for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 01:05:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52a.google.com (mail-ed1-x52a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 987823A0D63 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 01:05:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id j21so30085762edt.11 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 05 Nov 2021 01:05:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=miek-nl.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; bh=jg4deZtzvg8Q9pH3EHB1mQ1ye5zPLKGuMAZzx6vNBbQ=; b=MvPQwkjktSanRqNLbwOhwvNDeieOPlhEJySVIF5s0B+y48f2YKApIl42Hiz0+p3QKG ey2qcqwgLXRXj+vhmE7e3pLr0BIciHnkxmfbUBYKQq+I/Mu7bUJ3Peg9UPneaVqyXU90 bCl/BhqCBnT8X0pTkqV3YmTyfNQNTw+h274Lbc45ECmNJunubZ5c1DdalYneXsu4ZSv+ SNL++map/Cnt4bCalUTL0aTHVzUAr4G52Yp3A3b1ai5ualDlkh25POSV4N+K0lm3pQte FVDbzBY64wkf8DEZBD1G0GgUMRUMDC9CQjSXmRWW/psO8hAN1CtKZ5VTF3YjQnrO4cvC MoWQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=jg4deZtzvg8Q9pH3EHB1mQ1ye5zPLKGuMAZzx6vNBbQ=; b=m1UZagyGbSPyToWQjWMmN0kgMwuCS5w3JIQ89bSw1mfxpgTKiVN94BOeeO0R1XFWlj v/naKTyB1HsV4oHIZnuqBXTvLrewKpMmbklo+5ZyxTtJRvZNsoh7q3fhYaNGVQHWTUwY zijWYIIk3Tjkiw579SgcNyDb2IL1k/kz8ontQGQ0Yc1igIQ2ygqeLOJn7pvlPWd5S3e1 xorkSUHISvwY5TeU/WRoCvETRT9jRyTBXoNe4ppk958YwYliN/fuTS6FKsoIu9JkwS4i VW/lRGprhiREz26fhhIsEFBrgWnDjrqudlNTczSO+L4603v5x2+HGSKSWvFUQk159q3D DCYA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530VfOIwjUZ++qPnvBgy3kvivScJv78g6+wUq5Q5iCfM/3olLi0A deTuc93lcBPtltC54FcV8DWmBgyze0c85ZNm
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxJ5tGRWomY4y7FhEe7rT7k0cCBm8Pn/wlhKB13dHwoZgHqkn4LNTnkdWVhalLEhP8DzYB57A==
X-Received: by 2002:a50:d50c:: with SMTP id u12mr76450824edi.118.1636099541466; Fri, 05 Nov 2021 01:05:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miek.nl (dhcp-077-251-206-012.chello.nl. [77.251.206.12]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p3sm3777043ejy.94.2021.11.05.01.05.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 05 Nov 2021 01:05:41 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2021 09:05:40 +0100
From: Miek Gieben <miek@miek.nl>
To: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Message-ID: <YYTl1NRopLyMfZXt@miek.nl>
Mail-Followup-To: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>, dnsop@ietf.org
References: <ybl7ddnr16f.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <ybl7ddnr16f.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/84Emz7h7Hz3A3sXiwgLG19qw9JM>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] nsec3-parameters opinions gathered
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2021 08:05:54 -0000

[ Quoting <wjhns1@hardakers.net> in "[DNSOP] nsec3-parameters opinions g..." ]
>I was waiting for the last discussion to die down (and then, um, for me
>to finally examine the opinions).  The results are in from the people
>that weighed in:
>
>  | who              | wants | accepts                    |
>  |------------------+-------+----------------------------|
>  | Peter van Dijk   |     0 | anything low               |
>  | Matthijs Mekking |   150 | 150 -- vendors implemented |
>  | Miek Gieben      |   100 | or lower                   |
>  | Paul Vixie       |     0 |                            |
>  | Vladimír Čunát   |   any |                            |
>  | Viktor Dukhovni  |     0 | 100 or 150                 |
>
>I think the consensus is "everyone wants low", but most are willing to
>accept any value up to 150.

To update, my 'wants' would actually be 0.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email