IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] new ANAME draft: draft-hunt-dnsop-aname-00.txt

"Peter van Dijk" <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com> Wed, 12 April 2017 19:08 UTC

Return-Path: <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C67F51296CD for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 12:08:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oAs0ZYPMzyL9 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 12:08:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shannon.7bits.nl (shannon.7bits.nl [IPv6:2a01:1b0:202:40::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42B8312EB3A for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 12:08:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.137.1] (unknown [82.168.30.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: peter) by shannon.7bits.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 11738C1B96; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 21:08:21 +0200 (CEST)
From: Peter van Dijk <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 21:08:20 +0200
Message-ID: <BCEC0679-9A9E-426F-8372-FC4E8E46C573@powerdns.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.20.999.1704111506120.15830@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <20170407181139.GB66383@isc.org> <cc3bbc7a-3f48-2f7f-a3d9-3f752874fc00@redhat.com> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1704111641290.4393@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <alpine.LRH.2.20.999.1704111147390.8670@bofh.nohats.ca> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1704111928520.4393@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <alpine.LRH.2.20.999.1704111506120.15830@bofh.nohats.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.6r5347)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/DQpSYLEVmWZkPZFih_ErD4wW8tQ>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] new ANAME draft: draft-hunt-dnsop-aname-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 19:08:25 -0000

On 11 Apr 2017, at 21:11, Paul Wouters wrote:

> I still feel using ANAME without preprocessing by auth nameservers and
> fixing returning multiple record type to a single query is the more
> generic and fix for this problem.

As Evan said, we would love to go back in time and add ANAME support to 
all existing resolvers out there, but we can’t. Until then, the auths 
will have to assist, as many of them are doing today already.

Kind regards,
-- 
Peter van Dijk
PowerDNS.COM BV - https://www.powerdns.com/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email